Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp4030879pxt; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:08:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdnwkIDCbClySd8HiKfmKpuOSpn/3/37ORkRpv2tpYiXZid4jFMM9Y895IS4sUfvwgp4Ak X-Received: by 2002:a02:b718:: with SMTP id g24mr30038545jam.72.1628644105934; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:08:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628644105; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PT/ANYVviIPGafl6ybFciIBM41pXs6BEKB2U2oBdFHbqj/kmUqRtF1SJGEI1NQ408U 1MppU2kkIuG4VLzgRXz4/epH9ZxEgk37Nfw7EOy76q8ZujV9D86Ny6mWtahxG8uzsv0L VV5/lQtyzUOUGV4J0jIQoAKkQCFeCcZKNvjcbAEiPMLRMJHjVJO+PH7neTMnFzxJlCQg Tov/L9QV4rrnQ1qmvTyFTKPzFq1q0hIdFKrJagoomn+k2E3E4O50BT8Q9jrQ0MsKCjPr lBXW1cFxVHzQjMITStCxRF/iSgJHLVBNq0Z8Rt6psjvSjCO/NhXYIZFAarZwk9t8O2i6 QpUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=kot3om5xn/A8CjnUuLO8RfBhjaE9whZ5d+HwyTcMYy8=; b=VenjxnSdLsGxXZ82xFmeTF4GW44Fb+0pZdER6v5r7+7f1lbzQ/zFSBPVZ9g31zRK9m xEwkhsuNdLerVvjfVubLu0ypdUtNG8w9BpoQhjK2jib5j1jNiyDAv9L0iyo3YAp0gfhb s1d9FIiGhmJKzLOj8CN3DFZQGXABmhzBe7KgzXncYfktIZqJjfxgmxWFP5skgSJz35Av UyGexi91snzNtdlBucNvaa5WBMlCS8av5ndQCoaoAvUYHtpYSFD402R8bBB/OIrf5Ufm 16wIa3OJoXilmYgXUZQLeySwLNeM2K85w/uqBi4jAoIZa5VRThpJE7kQpwAF3jDYKCvU jC9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si1682946ill.7.2021.08.10.18.08.14; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236015AbhHKBGn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:06:43 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:8005 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235897AbhHKBGm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:06:42 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gks8B6yK6zYmk0; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:06:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:06:17 +0800 Received: from [10.69.30.204] (10.69.30.204) by dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:06:17 +0800 Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] add frag page support in page pool To: Alexander Duyck , Jakub Kicinski CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , David Miller , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , Marcin Wojtas , , , Salil Mehta , , , Ilias Apalodimas , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Andrew Morton , "Peter Zijlstra" , Will Deacon , "Matthew Wilcox" , Vlastimil Babka , , , Peter Xu , "Feng Tang" , Jason Gunthorpe , Matteo Croce , Hugh Dickins , Jonathan Lemon , Alexander Lobakin , "Willem de Bruijn" , , Cong Wang , Kevin Hao , , Marco Elver , Yonghong Song , , , Martin KaFai Lau , , Netdev , LKML , bpf , , Linux-MM References: <1628217982-53533-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20210810070159.367e680e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <1eb903a5-a954-e405-6088-9b9209703f5e@redhat.com> <20210810074306.6cbd1a73@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: <6e34a281-4082-15b7-e355-20b8bc97f427@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:06:16 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.69.30.204] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.98) To dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/8/10 23:09, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:43 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:23:52 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >>> On 10/08/2021 16.01, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:46:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: >>>>> enable skb's page frag recycling based on page pool in >>>>> hns3 drvier. >>>> >>>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> I had hoped to see more acks / reviewed-by before this got applied. >>> E.g. from MM-people as this patchset changes struct page and page_pool >>> (that I'm marked as maintainer of). >> >> Sorry, it was on the list for days and there were 7 or so prior >> versions, I thought it was ripe. If possible, a note that review >> will come would be useful. >> >>> And I would have appreciated an reviewed-by credit to/from Alexander >>> as he did a lot of work in the RFC patchset for the split-page tricks. Yeah, the credit goes to Ilias, Matteo, Matthew too, the patchset from them paves the path for supporting the skb frag page recycling. >> >> I asked him off-list, he said something I interpreted as "code is okay, >> but the review tag is not coming". > > Yeah, I ran out of feedback a revision or two ago and just haven't had > a chance to go through and add my reviewed by. If you want feel free > to add my reviewed by for the set. > > Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck Yeah, thanks for the time and patient for reviewing this patchset. By the way, I am still trying to implement the tx recycling mentioned in the other thread, which seems more controversial than rx recycling as tx recycling may touch the tcp/ip and socket layer. So it would be good have your opinion about that idea or implemention too:) > _______________________________________________ > Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org > To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org >