Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tpm: ibmvtpm: Rename tpm_process_cmd to tpm_status
 and define flag
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     nasastry@in.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
        George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20210809192159.2176580-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20210809192159.2176580-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20210810175855.fixtw5jks4gbmkua@kernel.org>
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <86f6a6c8-87cc-a397-35b3-a30220f12aed@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:50:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210810175855.fixtw5jks4gbmkua@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


On 8/10/21 1:58 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:21:59PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Rename the field tpm_processing_cmd to tpm_status in ibmvtpm_dev and set
>> the TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag while the vTPM is busy processing a command.
>>
>>
>>   		default:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
>> index 51198b137461..252f1cccdfc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
>> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ struct ibmvtpm_dev {
>>   	wait_queue_head_t wq;
>>   	u16 res_len;
>>   	u32 vtpm_version;
>> -	u8 tpm_processing_cmd;
>> +	u8 tpm_status;
>> +#define TPM_STATUS_BUSY		(1 << 0) /* vtpm is processing a command */
> Declare this already in the fix, and just leave the rename here.

You mean the fix patch does not use 'true' anymore but uses the 
TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag already but the name is still tpm_processing_cmd? 
And literally only the renaming of this field is done in the 2nd patch?


    Stefan


>
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define CRQ_RES_BUF_SIZE	PAGE_SIZE
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
>>
>>
> Otherwise, these look fine.
>
> /Jarkko