Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030621AbWK3P5O (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:57:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030623AbWK3P5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:57:13 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]:31528 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030621AbWK3P5M (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:57:12 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id; b=Y7saFNIuXEZjaNUbgypbJByAglrOFpiXCsj5tbG9zDJMgpS93bYuJD6iy9hh0px+ta3/zWNavKuC8uQMtaxlKIENKCQtncExxZZpNFVq36ZrXGnmFzpqlk/2nXB09jYgRG9py/MZcnbhHJ0rtG9FLT4iuk86iwRhVwL2w+VqnT0= Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:56:08 +0900 (JST) To: tike64@yahoo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: realtime-preempt and arm In-Reply-To: <20061129085705.52839.qmail@web57906.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20061129085705.52839.qmail@web57906.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 22.0.91 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: junjiec@gmail.com Message-ID: <456eff57.0e1fcf5c.617c.44a6@mx.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2324 Lines: 80 Hi, Without the support of High Resolution Timer supported, the timer resolution wouldn't change. With high-resolution-timer supported, our arm926-based board could get resolution like 40~50us. There are codes you can reference ,may be you should just try to implement it. JFI, Thanks. From: tike64 Subject: realtime-preempt and arm Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:57:05 -0800 (PST) > Hi all, > > I'm trying the realtime-preempt patch-2.6.18-rt6 on > lh7a400 arm system with little success. In a test > program I try 5 ms timeout with select() but get 20 ms > avg or 26 ms max. When the framebuffer scrolls, the > max delay goes up to 59 ms. With a vanilla kernel I > get 10 ms (because of tick resolution?), 11 ms and 39 > ms. > > My question is, is the realtime-preempt patch supposed > to work on arm architecture and/or without high > resolution timer (which lh7a40x seems to lack) at all > or should I just try to be more clever. > > Relevant code: > > ==== > prio.sched_priority = 99; > if (sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_RR, &prio) < 0) ... > if (mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) < 0) ... > while (1) { > t = raw_timer(); > tv.tv_usec = 5000; > tv.tv_sec = 0; > select(0, 0, 0, 0, &tv); > t = raw_timer() - t; > if (max_t < t) max_t = t; > if (min_t > t) min_t = t; > avg_t += t; > ++n; > if (n < 100) continue; > printf("%i revs; min: %i max: %i avg: %i\n", > n, > min_t, > max_t, > (avg_t + n / 2) / n); > ==== > > Relevant config: PREEMPT_RT, PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS, > PREEMPT_HARDIRQS > > I didnt' enable HIGH_RES_TIMERS because lh7a40x seems > not to support it. > > -- > > tike > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Cheap talk? > Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > http://voice.yahoo.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/