Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp4391795pxt; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:09:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyqx9gzKexBltJ8RmjP23NIAC5jnjn3kSeoI2CbxtMHSGSoOq1ymncThrc2InyTFP8rzwA X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4751:: with SMTP id j17mr3353483ejs.39.1628683749420; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:09:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628683749; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e63LrjVWOO/E/NI1oqQTGHAFnqRukf4Mnd5GSVeU2f84N/Mt64Bw3E/X1qen6Lze6n mq0dM7oW8tiMltU0nE9aeR9Cx9IraHfYIOKO6feTbWQHQG+MSh0+2M6lcp8SpT7bgpGZ oU63OzAqRDJwpnXK0fYionYEwzE9RyQzykUy+qhbXsjHfSFiRMF37iYGCb8VlMlty8Ot SGLjBum1CqcPwZeRR34zgDfZ3NTNOE8OeqD3uv3nImRYg1Dv+20v4ilsgjzVAGiCY7Xq /q1RYnrYdBfSGV6awDUjSUwRoR6BFf/btiF1blcWxG/pi8I4OVbt2ufZPn117UnyWYDH WhFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ZQqUTl/ANTKwsb5vEpd7CNjPV4niDPEDQOLEDcTO4Sg=; b=GIivm3y8iNjb02GfUEBKECrG0gaazSOPig7S84iusP6i5J6eu5IBbd8DoPYPOcDsLT calbmKd5zC0H0nOSYR5iYPhHMmhbaYCWFXwk6rkLmmJeh2RAt3frUqPRqROuU/rXKtkG XJZcc4mH9Cn/Iit6rYTl1v2M5piSDEXxuPUjJGB2Z25YS4EXQotxhAXwnclefiJzNu2n H+FGyie5YXdV9onzL1jgmu+dq/H5uuFlHh8WyXLLb5qbBVbTPmCeI9/ZHPw1WVHkEoxl sa3fEUJhWKYCzlByYElTySeDNHepO5Avtu39vVRTM6U8QFmAeVwjgMPc7JEnIyZjEv1U 5orQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="EVoRi/dr"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s21si3661338edt.17.2021.08.11.05.08.40; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="EVoRi/dr"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232496AbhHKMEv (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48698 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232160AbhHKMEu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:50 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6127D60F55; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1628683466; bh=1/ul8lTpnB4T++xzDF3kRFrA2xyEls7zKujxDteqWws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EVoRi/drbZA10GqMWQqMmCoGAgW4Royyy0CA+6YNMUfjh0ivQaLCh9tX9suVJWJhQ DHwrdzBb+C3sDOcDa7hs/wGTbPlX7jTnhKThl1cLojTXdv/nywsx5dinAFS8ml7Qpe 6M548VZLJmoJwx1UJlLzoKqbPE0VldIiADMotoUf986q2t8pTy8S6ntOBUqtTWyPHQ 4TfSQ2U4+U9Bevg+AIfxFDiOW3awR2RdFk65K/GAoYfjcDynTwnD9x+mjr5wb3uKdx rmWZZ+roqwqo8cE+AlXBnZ1jNmJwsqt5XH6EaPIFkg1uGUBH6QAfRro3yE0VetTfKT v/W01nfpUVP8A== Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:04:21 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Vineet Gupta Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] ARC: mm: Enable STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS Message-ID: References: <20210811004258.138075-1-vgupta@kernel.org> <20210811004258.138075-7-vgupta@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210811004258.138075-7-vgupta@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 05:42:46PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > In the past I've refrained from doing this (atleast 2 times) due to the ^ at least > slight code bloat due to ABI implications of pte_t etc becoming sttuct ^ struct > > Per ARC ABI, functions return struct via memory and not through register > r0, even if the struct would fits in register(s) ^ fit > > - caller allocates space on stack and passes the address as first arg > (r0), shifting rest of args by one > > - callee creates return struct in memory (referenced via r0) > > This time around the code actually shrunk slightly (due to subtle > inlining heuristic effects), but still slightly inefficient due to > return values passed through memory. That however seems like a small Out of curiosity, is this actually measurable on real world applications? > cost compared to maintenance burden given the impending new mmu support > for page walk etc > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > --- > arch/arc/include/asm/page.h | 26 -------------------------- > arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > index 4a9d33372fe2..c4ac827379cd 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > @@ -34,12 +34,6 @@ void copy_user_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from, > unsigned long u_vaddr, struct vm_area_struct *vma); > void clear_user_page(void *to, unsigned long u_vaddr, struct page *page); > > -#undef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS > - > -#ifdef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS > -/* > - * These are used to make use of C type-checking.. > - */ > typedef struct { > #ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40 > unsigned long long pte; > @@ -64,26 +58,6 @@ typedef struct { > > #define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x)) > > -#else /* !STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS */ > - > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40 > -typedef unsigned long long pte_t; > -#else > -typedef unsigned long pte_t; > -#endif > -typedef unsigned long pgd_t; > -typedef unsigned long pgprot_t; > - > -#define pte_val(x) (x) > -#define pgd_val(x) (x) > -#define pgprot_val(x) (x) > -#define __pte(x) (x) > -#define __pgd(x) (x) > -#define __pgprot(x) (x) > -#define pte_pgprot(x) (x) > - > -#endif > - > typedef pte_t * pgtable_t; > > /* > diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > index 95c649fbc95a..052bbd8b1e5f 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > +++ b/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void __iomem *ioremap(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size) > if (arc_uncached_addr_space(paddr)) > return (void __iomem *)(u32)paddr; > > - return ioremap_prot(paddr, size, PAGE_KERNEL_NO_CACHE); > + return ioremap_prot(paddr, size, pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL_NO_CACHE)); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioremap); > > -- > 2.25.1 > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.