Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] cpu_pm: cpu_pm_notifier_chain vs PREEMPT_RT
Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:14:30 +0100
Message-Id: <20210811201432.1976916-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi folks,

This is v3 of:

  http://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811131405.1731576-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com

which addresses cpu_pm's notifier chain not playing nice with PREEMPT_RT.

Revisions
=========

v1 -> v2
++++++++

o Reword changelog; clarify comments (Sebastian)
o Delete atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust() (Sebastian)

Valentin Schneider (2):
  cpu_pm: Make notifier chain use a raw_spinlock_t
  notifier: Remove atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust()

 include/linux/notifier.h |  2 --
 kernel/cpu_pm.c          | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 kernel/notifier.c        | 19 ---------------
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1