Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031640AbWLARNN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:13:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031645AbWLARNN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:13:13 -0500 Received: from [198.186.3.68] ([198.186.3.68]:2733 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031640AbWLARNL (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:13:11 -0500 Message-ID: <457062A7.20504@pathscale.com> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:13:11 -0800 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton Cc: dreier@cisco.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads References: <20061130213820.5ed22d81.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061130213820.5ed22d81.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 447 Lines: 12 Andrew Morton wrote: > The name memcpy_cachebypass() doesn't tell us whether it bypasses caching > on the source, the dest or both. It'd be nice if it did. > Yep, I'll fix that and resubmit.