Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:57:06 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: prefer = {} initializations to = {0}
Message-ID: <YRfZwrJUutB4IO+G@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
References: <20210805104353.GD26417@kili>
 <1b94e688-a070-998a-3014-96bcbaed4cae@wanadoo.fr>
 <YRfVYxQ126AOuexl@unreal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YRfVYxQ126AOuexl@unreal>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 05:38:27PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

> There are number of reasons why you didn't notice any difference.
> 1. {} is GCC extension
> 2. {} was adopted in latest C standards, so need to check which one GCC 10
> is using by default.
> 3. Main difference will be in padding - {0} will set to zero fields but
> won't touch padding, while {} will zero everything.

References on (3), please?