Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936203AbWLATqd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:46:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936176AbWLATqd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:46:33 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:58831 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031612AbWLATqc (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:46:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:53:37 +0000 From: Alan To: Ben Collins Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Piel Subject: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline Message-ID: <20061201195337.39ed9992@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1165001705.5257.959.camel@gullible> References: <1164998179.5257.953.camel@gullible> <20061201185657.0b4b5af7@localhost.localdomain> <1165001705.5257.959.camel@gullible> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 568 Lines: 15 > > The whole approach of using filp_open() not the firmware interface > > is horribly ugly and does not belong mainstream. > > What about the point that userspace (udev, and such) is not available > when DSDT loading needs to occur? Init hasn't even started at that > point. Does that change the fact it is ugly ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/