Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161334AbWLAU6S (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:58:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161340AbWLAU6S (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:58:18 -0500 Received: from adelie.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.139]:4553 "EHLO adelie.ubuntu.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161334AbWLAU6R (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:58:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline From: Ben Collins To: Alan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Piel In-Reply-To: <20061201195337.39ed9992@localhost.localdomain> References: <1164998179.5257.953.camel@gullible> <20061201185657.0b4b5af7@localhost.localdomain> <1165001705.5257.959.camel@gullible> <20061201195337.39ed9992@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:58:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1165006694.5257.968.camel@gullible> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 775 Lines: 19 On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:53 +0000, Alan wrote: > > > The whole approach of using filp_open() not the firmware interface > > > is horribly ugly and does not belong mainstream. > > > > What about the point that userspace (udev, and such) is not available > > when DSDT loading needs to occur? Init hasn't even started at that > > point. > > Does that change the fact it is ugly ? No, but it does beg the question "how else can it be done"? Distros need a way for users to add a fixed DSDT without recompiling their own kernels. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/