Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162147AbWLAXCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:02:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1162162AbWLAXCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:02:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44492 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162147AbWLAXCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:02:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:02:01 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Sebastian Kemper Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?) Message-Id: <20061201150201.4e8c9edb.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20061201182855.GA7867@section_eight> References: <20061201130359.GA3999@section_eight> <20061201182855.GA7867@section_eight> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 712 Lines: 16 On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:28:55 +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: > I also increased the wait time from 5 seconds to 20 in > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c but that didn't change anything. That was a good try, but I thought maybe it needs doing something twice, or having some extra bits set... There's always a possibility that the BIOS refuses the handoff on purpose though. If it does not cause any misbehaviour, it may be safe to ignore. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/