Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162390AbWLAXaA (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:30:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1162387AbWLAX37 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:29:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:26335 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162379AbWLAX34 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:29:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:29:22 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: thockin@hockin.org Cc: Sebastian Kemper , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?) Message-Id: <20061201152922.93cc59a4.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20061201232339.GA25645@hockin.org> References: <20061201130359.GA3999@section_eight> <20061201182855.GA7867@section_eight> <20061201150201.4e8c9edb.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20061201232339.GA25645@hockin.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 581 Lines: 14 On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:23:39 -0800, thockin@hockin.org wrote: > BIOS handoff assumes an SMI, right? Could SMI be masked? That might be a bad idea, because things like fans may be controlled by SMM BIOS. The best thing we can do is to follow the published procedure, and maybe insert a workaround if Sebastian can identify it. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/