Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162354AbWLAXaL (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:30:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1162243AbWLAX3i (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:29:38 -0500 Received: from teetot.devrandom.net ([66.35.250.243]:4060 "EHLO teetot.devrandom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162265AbWLAXXo (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:23:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:23:39 -0800 From: thockin@hockin.org To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Sebastian Kemper , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OHCI] BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug?) Message-ID: <20061201232339.GA25645@hockin.org> References: <20061201130359.GA3999@section_eight> <20061201182855.GA7867@section_eight> <20061201150201.4e8c9edb.zaitcev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061201150201.4e8c9edb.zaitcev@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 842 Lines: 17 On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:02:01PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:28:55 +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: > > > I also increased the wait time from 5 seconds to 20 in > > drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c but that didn't change anything. > > That was a good try, but I thought maybe it needs doing something > twice, or having some extra bits set... There's always a possibility > that the BIOS refuses the handoff on purpose though. If it does not > cause any misbehaviour, it may be safe to ignore. BIOS handoff assumes an SMI, right? Could SMI be masked? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/