Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:24:03 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: irq-meson-gpio: make it possible to build
 as a module
Message-ID: <YRtkE62O+4EiyzF9@google.com>
References: <87r1hwwier.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <7h7diwgjup.fsf@baylibre.com>
 <87im0m277h.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <CAGETcx9OukoWM_qprMse9aXdzCE=GFUgFEkfhhNjg44YYsOQLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sfzpwq4f.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <CAGETcx95kHrv8wA-O+-JtfH7H9biJEGJtijuPVN0V5dUKUAB3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGETcx8bpWQEnkpJ0YW9GqX8WE0ewT45zqkbWWdZ0ktJBhG4yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YQuZ2cKVE+3Os25Z@google.com>
 <YRpeVLf18Z+1R7WE@google.com>
 <CAGETcx-gSJD0Ra=U_55k3Anps11N_3Ev9gEQV6NaXOvqwP0J3g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-gSJD0Ra=U_55k3Anps11N_3Ev9gEQV6NaXOvqwP0J3g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > I sent out the proper fix as a series:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210804214333.927985-1-saravanak@google.com/T/#t
> > > >
> > > > Marc, can you give it a shot please?
> > > >
> > > > -Saravana
> > >
> > > Superstar!  Thanks for taking the time to rectify this for all of us.
> >
> > Just to clarify:
> >
> >   Are we waiting on a subsequent patch submission at this point?
> 
> Not that I'm aware of. Andrew added a "Reviewed-by" to all 3 of my
> proper fix patches. I didn't think I needed to send any newer patches.
> Is there some reason you that I needed to?

Actually, I meant *this* patch.

But happy to have unlocked your patches also. :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog