Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:48:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/3] ptp_ocp: Switch to use
 module_pci_driver() macro
Message-ID: <YRuF5hd0BL/RAEZw@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210813122737.45860-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20210813111407.0c2288f1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
 <CAHp75VeEO+givZ_SvUc2Wu7=iKvoqJEWYnMD=RHZCxKhqsV-9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210816210101.cnhb4xfifzctr4kj@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210816210101.cnhb4xfifzctr4kj@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:30:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 9:15 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 15:27:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Eliminate some boilerplate code by using module_pci_driver() instead of
> > > > init/exit, and, if needed, moving the salient bits from init into probe.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Jonathan has a series in flight which is fixing some of the same issues:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=530079&state=*
> > >
> > > Please hold off for a day or two so it can get merged, and if you don't
> > > mind double check at that point which of your patches are still needed.
> > 
> > Actually it may be the other way around. Since patch 2 in his series
> > is definitely an unneeded churn here, because my devm conversion will
> > have to effectively revert it.
> > 
> > 
> > > According to patchwork your series does not apply to net-next as of
> > > last night so it'll need a respin anyway.
> > 
> > I hope he will chime in and see what we can do the best.
> 
> I'm going to submit a respin of the last patch, I screwed something
> up from all the various trees I'm using.
> 
> Please update to net-next first - the firat patch in your series
> doesn't make any longer, given the current status.

I'll rebase my stuff on top of net-next and resubmit.

Thanks!


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko