Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210629094038.18610-1-harini.katakam@xilinx.com>
 <20210629094038.18610-3-harini.katakam@xilinx.com> <20210714210803.GA3522064@robh.at.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210714210803.GA3522064@robh.at.kernel.org>
From:   Harini Katakam <harinik@xilinx.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:46:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFcVECJXhjQLZdfQm8n_0cLsuh6CFPJbSA4A5XXQL+6+okb+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mscc: Add RGMII RX and TX delay tuning
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xilinx.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, kuba@kernel.org,
        steen.hegelund@microchip.com, bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com,
        ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, likaige@loongson.cn,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rob,

Thanks for the review and sorry I din't reply earlier.
<snip>
> > +- vsc8531,rx-delay   : RGMII RX delay. Allowed values are defined in
>
> 'vsc8531' is not a vendor. The form is <vendor>,<propname>.

I was just aligning it with existing optional property names in this document.
Could you please let me know if mscc,rx-delay is more appropriate?

Regards,
Harini