Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424259AbWLBR0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:26:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1424252AbWLBR0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:26:16 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:38296 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424248AbWLBR0P (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:26:15 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 17:31:07 +0000 From: Alan To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nathanael Nerode , Andres Salomon Subject: Re: RFC: removing the dgrs net driver Message-ID: <20061202173107.47f609ca@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20061202171932.GP11084@stusta.de> References: <20061202171932.GP11084@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 19 On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:19:32 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the > dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel > without any hardware ever produced...). > > Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true? As I understand it a small number of such devices were produced, but I have no objection to it going away. Even if someone had such a card it would not actually be useful any more. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/