Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1321702pxb; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx81DWuN/0axBsnb51UB23r3kYds15da0klO+nwNOlBhdMeWczy7CW+LnZQwW57bRqnm/C/ X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8b17:: with SMTP id k23mr3381308ion.17.1629215838695; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629215838; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HWUXg8lcUrkbx8S9Ehe3LRYzGcKq4Zg1RAzk+i5pmXoS8ptYgMbKsd/KLftFp3PL6A BNyecnSZlb1nhDkG1OGg0ThTP/HMLO9kw2FGHi8zcNXBFS1ftM6M/NoPw/KvCaIYLwLh G0tp/UDUjKNWZHo8QDScykVIpbCwN0K61PqRVLJ26bJDoMoc5PDTLVsxMWFCsFpW+jUo 6e3UFtL2iCd345ROtnbgmk9phkBW+4CHFpMszLyHFhxq8xEQIAIKwbwP9tHpBTQbjPjj J+/NUwT847SpbRtqnCD8S4aLA1xwKD5Z1vx+DalQ42flwNvxKNIrBrnA0N/r978i0Ziy 4PBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=5H+7vJbliQsK8rs/+6iZ2HR7NrfuQkz/HOEYxQLMkoI=; b=IxbmClTTf3xCQq0Oj0qITQLw6RIQk9KrJ9SN3d9bLbSJ6bDEfMPXJMtbP4K4CcfyzK Ij3/HHmJcNLP3IXToZ2ZGIWtlZQY2VSWhhHrJ4mXgiWCS2TxhXmt862cWAzU2b6Bv/hC 5/TqOqP+B6HyFeQdI3xALGHKwg99KSLdb1igcpiNHLmAuggVLbn5sLwBWLeu4oAAa5jZ Mkhu8ubierzpErFFxr51SI7CgFdtvu6M/kBPJeDORJECMKUEwQVABIAxwsEsR9/x6bt6 CUJGyzuLoxKOfRhsvntVE9Ft07B55mWxkHvJ10/NqZO/VPE5tLIu2cRTwZPuFfYBpC+I hwNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=pK+MLTaq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si2855971jaj.5.2021.08.17.08.57.07; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=pK+MLTaq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240692AbhHQPze (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:55:34 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49038 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240281AbhHQPtC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:49:02 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E254460F58; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1629215290; bh=5H+7vJbliQsK8rs/+6iZ2HR7NrfuQkz/HOEYxQLMkoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pK+MLTaqQaH4Vkn15pGfHDsShIQF/E8n2g8oBolYwxlF9M4WGXhND3rv0j/TUhOuD HiRo3zpGif/fRzNswPlKWa93QFr85bNRh1wNFt2EYzO0LpWZEiiG1iYNikRRNN/spO GeiaoWrNZS7RoMl81z0aN9Kx2cNsBbzlF/6gi1lY= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:48:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Xianting Tian Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Message-ID: References: <20210817132300.165014-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > We tested the patch, it worked normally. Who is "we"? > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Like I said before, I need another developer from your company to review and sign-off on this patch (and the other one), before I am willing to look at it, based on the previous mistakes that have happened here. thanks, greg k-h