Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87r1hwwier.wl-maz@kernel.org> <7h7diwgjup.fsf@baylibre.com>
 <87im0m277h.wl-maz@kernel.org> <CAGETcx9OukoWM_qprMse9aXdzCE=GFUgFEkfhhNjg44YYsOQLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sfzpwq4f.wl-maz@kernel.org> <CAGETcx95kHrv8wA-O+-JtfH7H9biJEGJtijuPVN0V5dUKUAB3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGETcx8bpWQEnkpJ0YW9GqX8WE0ewT45zqkbWWdZ0ktJBhG4yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YQuZ2cKVE+3Os25Z@google.com> <YRpeVLf18Z+1R7WE@google.com>
 <CAGETcx-gSJD0Ra=U_55k3Anps11N_3Ev9gEQV6NaXOvqwP0J3g@mail.gmail.com> <YRtkE62O+4EiyzF9@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <YRtkE62O+4EiyzF9@google.com>
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:12:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-FS_88nQuF=xN4iJJ-nGnaeTnO-iiGpZuNELqE42FtoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: irq-meson-gpio: make it possible to build as
 a module
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:24 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > > I sent out the proper fix as a series:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210804214333.927985-1-saravanak@go=
ogle.com/T/#t
> > > > >
> > > > > Marc, can you give it a shot please?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Saravana
> > > >
> > > > Superstar!  Thanks for taking the time to rectify this for all of u=
s.
> > >
> > > Just to clarify:
> > >
> > >   Are we waiting on a subsequent patch submission at this point?
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of. Andrew added a "Reviewed-by" to all 3 of my
> > proper fix patches. I didn't think I needed to send any newer patches.
> > Is there some reason you that I needed to?
>
> Actually, I meant *this* patch.

I think it'll be nice if Neil addresses the stuff Marc mentioned
(ideally) using the macros I suggested. Not sure if Marc is waiting on
that though. Marc also probably wants my mdio-mux series to merge
first before he takes this patch. So that it doesn't break networking
in his device.

-Saravana

>
> But happy to have unlocked your patches also. :)
>
> --
> Lee Jones [=E6=9D=8E=E7=90=BC=E6=96=AF]
> Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
> Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for Arm SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog