Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1425058pxb; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziY8GloAXybw9rwvnezA+fdtJFnIwBKe6rv+AdGAastt1+mKVhTEgHsmXz5PTnmEfcjUrq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1210:: with SMTP id y16mr3781243iot.159.1629224384066; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629224384; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q8pSukGr9jx8gY0rp9C423cuB4XaYNkCSSYrjR2H4YzGI3RuT8gbNE2YQsDRc978Yz 3IjHkdZ19r7UwUa6ZCYylSRjOOHYBKh0KiCmZ/BpQ45NQdvm1qxOtNCxd1ZvPTO5hzRL kbdIrxL9gIMATDhVfErweSVsYzSoLPUb7F1gVXz494yVTKx8tcAuxETsCz85NHhu/Uqp v9KCOnq85rhU5gc7Bvp229u+MzSMsrpTEOszOgZK9gb/62QVHC2zzHo8azyZACUvv8L4 BFsy3knmiALVIXBmRrhTQfNcCxAbaV18wH9ww7ovyIrw4UpQiQSxS0xTJjlXgCx7SM+Z w7jA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=eDdv2rzwUMD4SObVyB6gkvhjez+GHyH9zfR8+Ve+7sM=; b=Cx+9Ak9tb5jbd3BvjVs4DVaYkVDiiCl9yWkUM1VJow047hLECHhYvsUVrQFYTJH0/D wt2IXtCXodOb/qJXkk60spYvHfBbRoJB/GWEJ6MX0wiDt7lsppC2yDqWm0MBQfMWZgCv QUWp/CaMH+JDNrSPoCtsZYyeB6BEXBX7uj4T7KTOu1YjsLKHWiSMcTasajP93WF3P6Qo VFwZt9xFVfNOBO9IwYsd7Gwjp623hg6/bA1oFVvVSftkC86ZCGQ1io+XX/K3fqrl/PZo FmLg+j8cQ6XLgusIhTmykN7QKU/9MLMemzJStDjcPswq6Akr8eXY0R9dUyhWeDl0iyHA q0rg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h0gfcuKU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t24si2638357iol.88.2021.08.17.11.19.30; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h0gfcuKU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232828AbhHQSSJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:18:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52458 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229850AbhHQSSI (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:18:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485ECC061764 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id k5so15215840lfu.4 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eDdv2rzwUMD4SObVyB6gkvhjez+GHyH9zfR8+Ve+7sM=; b=h0gfcuKUZFJy/L3rm/JRdVw4fII5RbW6t/pPv+iGWr1OvJZV0bUBeEgyGeAuI+oeeY 6ijS1h459OkiMhxigAhtRwEXafFri4e7eu5aSHPSL/L1eSUT/I2VNLUT4J0pcsM5KjXK zqghdhL4PnjoHlVns9RDc0S1k0AY/3h5dPrSv508/Z8HDWRzVylizKwyve7kxB+bHOfc c/4mYHaf34GZO+7akOXjOjnGrxve+6yeu3kyPwVyI9lMgqzHsXzB3rXAnFWnD+OUYgdz SvmNNT5CDMEPNpZvSPDlQZSIHou68vJNqHOK75PyZfQten1qpPFrP6gfNpC9nrA14IAy VwfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eDdv2rzwUMD4SObVyB6gkvhjez+GHyH9zfR8+Ve+7sM=; b=CJOruteMr370WOOtEf+wYFQ9MC9IX7QqhJu/hKbLSZeoZ3CGkj6IWM8CYD4ZTXHWHC NkU9hKrhvQbHYyGdLJM2bfWMrx1H0voFKG6VuQsY57GHr8a/peK2e5bDV9Pm1IOR7je+ mOPsnp6nlOPKPochWHPN0Ej/TWf2+j3wmKZ+bC7NU5t2uOPAbIikCHsgsx8zhUx+mCFN HVunzqQl7kJ5U0/+d/+xSABTc9E2Dbi+lKreV1Ydc61wSTA2ffsjp0Cd2E+QXuOQnvKt VJIfGqntsShRUHRvKlvcoZ4pCM4r3OwM7xnZu3i3SbXqHvqeeY9mCDoizimkDgBBrNoT UAdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fJgLr4PqX3f4MiCZbSEW4czZlNEIX5lSILwd9arvMMk63/Juf skjDuxGFlT8ZU5jUZv6HJ7FmAy69cgErybJiWVgBBW0M9imkOA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:7117:: with SMTP id m23mr3507570lfc.73.1629224253295; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <269701460.117528.1629210189833@office.mailbox.org> <796036867.117557.1629210288168@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <796036867.117557.1629210288168@office.mailbox.org> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:17:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, Makefile: Add new generic x86-64 settings v2/v3/v4 To: torvic9@mailbox.org Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com" , "graysky@archlinux.us" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Masahiro Yamada Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:24 AM torvic9 via Clang Built Linux wrote: > > Add new generic x86-64 CPU tunings introduced with recent versions of > gcc and clang, as documented in x86-64-psABI [1]. > > This is taken straight from graysky's CPU optimization patch with minor > modifications [2]. > > [1] https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9a6b9396884b67c7c > [2] https://github.com/graysky2/kernel_compiler_patch > > Signed-off-by: Tor Vic > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/x86/Makefile.cpu | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu > index 814fe0d349b0..a2c872aa5a0b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu > @@ -294,6 +294,30 @@ config GENERIC_CPU > Generic x86-64 CPU. > Run equally well on all x86-64 CPUs. > > +config GENERIC_CPU_V2 > + bool "Generic-x86-64-v2" > + depends on ( CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION > 110000 ) || ( CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 ) Can we stick with either > or >=, but at least be consistent? Also, there's unnecessary whitespace inside the parens that could be removed. > + depends on X86_64 > + help > + Generic x86-64 CPU. > + Run equally well on all x86-64 CPUs with min support of x86-64-v2. > + > +config GENERIC_CPU_V3 > + bool "Generic-x86-64-v3" > + depends on ( CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION > 110000 ) || ( CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 ) > + depends on X86_64 > + help > + Generic x86-64-v3 CPU with v3 instructions. > + Run equally well on all x86-64 CPUs with min support of x86-64-v3. > + > +config GENERIC_CPU_V4 > + bool "Generic-x86-64-v4" > + depends on ( CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION > 110000 ) || ( CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 ) > + depends on X86_64 > + help > + Generic x86-64 CPU with v4 instructions. > + Run equally well on all x86-64 CPUs with min support of x86-64-v4. > + > endchoice > > config X86_GENERIC > @@ -318,7 +342,7 @@ config X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT > config X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT > int > default "7" if MPENTIUM4 || MPSC > - default "6" if MK7 || MK8 || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MATOM || MVIAC7 || X86_GENERIC || GENERIC_CPU > + default "6" if MK7 || MK8 || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MATOM || MVIAC7 || X86_GENERIC || GENERIC_CPU || GENERIC_CPU_V2 || GENERIC_CPU_V3 || GENERIC_CPU_V4 > default "4" if MELAN || M486SX || M486 || MGEODEGX1 > default "5" if MWINCHIP3D || MWINCHIPC6 || MCRUSOE || MEFFICEON || MCYRIXIII || MK6 || MPENTIUMIII || MPENTIUMII || M686 || M586MMX || M586TSC || M586 || MVIAC3_2 || MGEODE_LX > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu b/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu > index fb407ae94d90..f190feefe964 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu > +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile.cpu > @@ -10,3 +10,9 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += \ > cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += $(call cc-option,-march=atom) \ > $(call cc-option,-mtune=atom,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic)) > cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += $(call cc-option,-mtune=generic) > + > +# New generic x86-64 CPU options. > +# Don't call the compiler, we have Kconfig compiler checks for these. You'd be surprised how quickly using time-relative words like "New" bitrot. My copy of "Modern C++" already doesn't feel very "modern" for example. I'd just drop the comment block here; we don't need a comment every time we skip cc-option checks. Thanks for the patches! > +cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_V2) += -march=x86-64-v2 > +cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_V3) += -march=x86-64-v3 > +cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_V4) += -march=x86-64-v4 > -- -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers