Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1484652pxb; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7odTrPxATndkaQKitUZI1D3S4FSge/QcqUP6SX6iXwhRQFHc4VFL+ATXeMX6kcqs7Pkfo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:35c9:: with SMTP id z9mr5850360edc.249.1629230255479; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629230255; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mgJLD+0QES0niik48WfyN3qMsvWdcd0f4vSerbhmb3Qa+8XpA6B3Hee+OVNcwvBDG+ +Ecu9u7unULywZkY50LIty6eiEf6z+dZTVA00ni5DpdPw5zbyP40UKtpzLGQCbzqowwY 4ou3UuUpc/ND65HKFK8JqMerTtgrbNUE8/b1fOgAPqJ28pa77plTDKFG+yCEdtbVvH/r hCYMAEwDdFiNJjW8TnRzjDPCIqurTP141X8IKsajhbvNxyxYAncwqJURR3Pwo141Qa1k M20wVEq5QD/weJ0cyHADR0KgqVypiGja/kmYBLLPmppEndgOC+l9TQt6jD6+axLZYUUO MBwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=7yTM7Sn30AJry/bLkGmfAm0zAU9alsmIgNfbLnQYKZo=; b=K+5REpIMi2MHgURZtDvZ0JfykJQ//J0Nn5PwMRdLm9XvYAr67aH8zHPO8BYzh6xVkI cR6sQkgMh0WYMcks7bHFatZe/4FCIyHAFe9yj4/Q271uDe+WP7T8PAoVNkVXFFGorMrT Roge/+HFjEHYwVJslv2LURjWnUz42oyOzYRG7sjqnCfgg/TtU3zXHsHhjdRUyDxgdozY 38gmejc2IC0HYRWuzHrOg6i3P+2lNfTW1HACV/wvFkedqyEk4EOZeMYPg7X6wnKatUCU 4U0pF93vSZ4gF32YQBjycGvTnkNg4gg5ef3kqLPHAo6JY0mavJ51ZfRlqUdi4rBIJGmB tovA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b="CS//o0DK"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s10si3719469edd.483.2021.08.17.12.57.07; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b="CS//o0DK"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233110AbhHQTyB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:54:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49538 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229466AbhHQTyA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:54:00 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 820736023D; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1629230006; bh=9GEGh06hgVZ4wI/Kk+52EPsOEBhM9iF9HKLdjFqgxfg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CS//o0DK+yKr6+6YKszPb0vm5D7X9Hj5mNaX71mkAZyA1XVhoVXklXMQZPvHuKMJ9 pWxenJ0tAOxyq0/kkJjLkYoUsZytFWCBHRgb3feDF8Q6y1fxZ5j0QQ6qU5JzLqT6AB PWCLHKPFisgeK7tvPjP318XW6sJUlLre4zYmTchw= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:53:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jann Horn Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 35/35] mm, slub: convert kmem_cpu_slab protection to local_lock Message-Id: <20210817125325.d0ed45d664596d1e80a591d7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20210805152000.12817-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20210805152000.12817-36-vbabka@suse.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:14:58 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Another fixup. Is it too many and should we replace it all with a v5? Maybe do a full resend when things have settled down and I can at least check that we match. What's your confidence level for a 5.15-rc1 merge? It isn't terribly well reviewed?