Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <418fdcbcf554d34cc6423a88974f916b64b3664c.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
From:   Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Cc:     Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
        Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:32:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <YRoN0vWFN6Lw22ej@eldamar.lan>
References: <20201103194912.184413-1-jcline@redhat.com>
         <20201125202648.5220-1-jcline@redhat.com>
         <b4da382b17a77b66e45fd374c9d806dac6054e3a.camel@redhat.com>
         <YRoN0vWFN6Lw22ej@eldamar.lan>
Organization: Red Hat
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we
currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future.

Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this?

On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > This patch series is:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you
> > need
> > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous
> > one
> > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise
> > patchwork
> > won't pick it up
> 
> Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost?
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore
> 

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat