Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp38574pxb; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:31:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyiq3gpHHr4UnpgtPAz3bDkQd0R4PcZAM/tcnowoVsJ9iCvKC0qH77RCBQUYjB0nYkfmQU X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4311:: with SMTP id m17mr7156991edc.374.1629250308959; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:31:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629250308; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oJYvo9/0fIHK/UVD10UD6+NRXTqg4ZoZd9MbGYMeipnG2ctQ0yJyrXl31sW85pO73I fUAk7mbFsXT968Cep65AXg1eH7A2wRv3CfdvtTXNlgU0u3mI49Nb6GNGyGYkX3wCOSne CT7+4eV+1f+e3f1KGT17ZvlqtIcsInCLRh1t6HmI3jbu0ezYMMlWzeChJ1vO+zxRLWfj zjpI8UCnL0DfG3mkzVJevKbXHUDwUN+yHyqddmMwV8dfgOMumQD22SPlbuU4xaLy9tbv rXArK1wCYgq2tXaVskKbf51Mn4OGZbBO1P86PMzkMoGUev3zZ12En17ia14d5auv06Ld GEFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject; bh=DwBH3MBd6o8DtlxLv6hXU9bi+GbJvb+XeSbRPMiMCaw=; b=eKX6XbdvSBceKCYpaf/cOfhGc5aI1IrdbVITN9kI0XnSI9FFxUiGsIzsU4P9OQyHvJ w43N+QDUws/kQ7b6epRLNUTf3dq34TgXirSdLGZwIYQcMub6PR8cXnzQ9CTPMRs5hH4o RD9pph2DO7d0YcEoWAkzQcvfOGjWfIxQcMc96Y0ngG78Fo3V+GhqZ2vfypt3CNuhHToO /Unq2aQT7sduueww1rvGp7K60LS5l3gqbTMJjDxK+QrRBOgEd2kVl4lyZuYWWLhakA8L 2Gb0QUJGcVrLo/mjkEvj13d5+uxepRJJKy95BY3H4+6uwgY7uqKq4D1AUcyLy/fqrsCi i4LA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b1si4232626edv.347.2021.08.17.18.31.26; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235485AbhHRBaQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:30:16 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:35266 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233027AbhHRBaQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:30:16 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10079"; a="203382777" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,330,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="203382777" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2021 18:29:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,330,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="531300286" Received: from dengjie-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.154.58]) ([10.239.154.58]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2021 18:29:38 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v15] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver To: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, jasowang@redhat.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, yu1.wang@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, stefanha@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, jiedeng@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn References: From: Jie Deng Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:29:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/8/18 4:22, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Michael S. Tsirkin > Okay, with rc6 being released, I won't wait for an immutable branch > anymore. I applied this now and we will see if there will be a merge > conflict. If so, it will be trivial to handle, I'd think. So: > > Applied to for-next, thanks! Thanks Wolfram!