Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp257319pxb; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:23:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHZKcJelY0agpCZFFtnk8YgRGIlHrcQ0Kl8W0CZ8JIWPwsj2Lr3OGqeGRWqq0fuAKpznlr X-Received: by 2002:a50:e789:: with SMTP id b9mr8768227edn.101.1629275001090; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:23:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629275001; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l2wgsFX1G7L2CHP3GPhAv+K1TwJgixLMGtR+NEMbHP5zMeZM0NtWtfmEOOR3sMpNkh Wx8rBjR+flb79bkNw05JDyXlrqvsIs/+wogeeRhXlfuTfql8L2P9BfWGbzgPyjTPlORA 2j+iZxCiNgaI1sWcCy81GkkceaUwygQEd82KBs+Y4fVbM44iDHgfiqaU4FlaFNHCoRGR i2sRk7ACfXcycMaLRhOxnV5S6Z+XThSH+lvAS16lfkCfnJ9YEPcaJIfzTrEHPAa30R5j rfg9fGwwQIWjg81BtARmlebsHUteuNhsUl5oQF/YxR7goN4fPR7yj/mxrgDrAwwCZJ++ kkkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=9V1snJksVg8aW0pZ0psXAA7xmsBQRzuDWPReXXENIvc=; b=kcuotYkKxLLeZhb4y1dq/QOjULBZnYdHl9qHIo3iPpGfkYgH6vc8jbIh7GUPu3RjxM LGyqdMvtWymPjjDdD2ckndXkd8rQW6lf5IcqUAzYuysgizKAXpnnFNAiFAZpIgn1R50c /3T1/CQE7uKaNKTpDUEGDQ7IZ89GSW/tegTOupZjG2ROBZvDXh94pC5i2ACGEKVpA6Iy l3BVRievM4xyi9ZiZ9n/275x9rf6jcrLTCMihqdKDn/oppXnLQcceHS7QhrBKx7TsNsZ b6pMsMm5CSTJWbne44InuvChR7utmYbs3L5+u8OoxClDBplrthvEwSGrztxC+E9ZGEs0 OgCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12si4873581ejv.389.2021.08.18.01.22.56; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238324AbhHRIWD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 04:22:03 -0400 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.44]:42027 "EHLO out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238006AbhHRIWC (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 04:22:02 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R131e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04400;MF=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=10;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Ujfv4hx_1629274885; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Ujfv4hx_1629274885) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:21:26 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com Cc: shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xianting Tian Subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:21:21 +0800 Message-Id: <20210818082122.166881-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210818082122.166881-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20210818082122.166881-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As well known, hvc backend driver(eg, virtio-console) can register its operations to hvc framework. The operations can contain put_chars(), get_chars() and so on. Some hvc backend may do dma in its operations. eg, put_chars() of virtio-console. But in the code of hvc framework, it may pass DMA incapable memory to put_chars() under a specific configuration, which is explained in commit c4baad5029(virtio-console: avoid DMA from stack): 1, c[] is on stack, hvc_console_print(): char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; cons_ops[index]->put_chars(vtermnos[index], c, i); 2, ch is on stack, static void hvc_poll_put_char(,,char ch) { struct tty_struct *tty = driver->ttys[0]; struct hvc_struct *hp = tty->driver_data; int n; do { n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, &ch, 1); } while (n <= 0); } Commit c4baad5029 is just the fix to avoid DMA from stack memory, which is passed to virtio-console by hvc framework in above code. But I think the fix is aggressive, it directly uses kmemdup() to alloc new buffer from kmalloc area and do memcpy no matter the memory is in kmalloc area or not. But most importantly, it should better be fixed in the hvc framework, by changing it to never pass stack memory to the put_chars() function in the first place. Otherwise, we still face the same issue if a new hvc backend using dma added in the future. In this patch, we make 'char out_buf[N_OUTBUF]' and 'chat out_ch' part of 'struct hvc_struct', so both two buf are no longer the stack memory. we can use it in above two cases separately. Introduce another array(cons_outbufs[]) for buffer pointers next to the cons_ops[] and vtermnos[] arrays. With the array, we can easily find the buffer, instead of traversing hp list. With the patch, we can remove the fix c4baad5029. Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Reviewed-by: Shile Zhang --- drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c | 27 ++++++++++++--------------- drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c index 5bb8c4e44..300e9c037 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c @@ -41,16 +41,6 @@ */ #define HVC_CLOSE_WAIT (HZ/100) /* 1/10 of a second */ -/* - * These sizes are most efficient for vio, because they are the - * native transfer size. We could make them selectable in the - * future to better deal with backends that want other buffer sizes. - */ -#define N_OUTBUF 16 -#define N_INBUF 16 - -#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(L1_CACHE_BYTES))) - static struct tty_driver *hvc_driver; static struct task_struct *hvc_task; @@ -142,6 +132,7 @@ static int hvc_flush(struct hvc_struct *hp) static const struct hv_ops *cons_ops[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES]; static uint32_t vtermnos[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES] = {[0 ... MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES - 1] = -1}; +static char *cons_outbufs[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES]; /* * Console APIs, NOT TTY. These APIs are available immediately when @@ -151,7 +142,7 @@ static uint32_t vtermnos[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES] = static void hvc_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, unsigned count) { - char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; + char *c; unsigned i = 0, n = 0; int r, donecr = 0, index = co->index; @@ -163,6 +154,10 @@ static void hvc_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, if (vtermnos[index] == -1) return; + c = cons_outbufs[index]; + if (!c) + return; + while (count > 0 || i > 0) { if (count > 0 && i < sizeof(c)) { if (b[n] == '\n' && !donecr) { @@ -879,8 +874,10 @@ static void hvc_poll_put_char(struct tty_driver *driver, int line, char ch) struct hvc_struct *hp = tty->driver_data; int n; + hp->out_ch = ch; + do { - n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, &ch, 1); + n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, hp->out_ch, 1); } while (n <= 0); } #endif @@ -922,8 +919,7 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, return ERR_PTR(err); } - hp = kzalloc(ALIGN(sizeof(*hp), sizeof(long)) + outbuf_size, - GFP_KERNEL); + hp = kzalloc(struct_size(hp, outbuf, outbuf_size), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); @@ -931,7 +927,6 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, hp->data = data; hp->ops = ops; hp->outbuf_size = outbuf_size; - hp->outbuf = &((char *)hp)[ALIGN(sizeof(*hp), sizeof(long))]; tty_port_init(&hp->port); hp->port.ops = &hvc_port_ops; @@ -964,6 +959,7 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, if (i < MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES) { cons_ops[i] = ops; vtermnos[i] = vtermno; + cons_outbufs[i] = hp->out_buf; } list_add_tail(&(hp->next), &hvc_structs); @@ -988,6 +984,7 @@ int hvc_remove(struct hvc_struct *hp) if (hp->index < MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES) { vtermnos[hp->index] = -1; cons_ops[hp->index] = NULL; + cons_outbufs[hp->index] = NULL; } /* Don't whack hp->irq because tty_hangup() will need to free the irq. */ diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h index 18d005814..b94576d55 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h @@ -32,13 +32,21 @@ */ #define HVC_ALLOC_TTY_ADAPTERS 8 +/* + * These sizes are most efficient for vio, because they are the + * native transfer size. We could make them selectable in the + * future to better deal with backends that want other buffer sizes. + */ +#define N_OUTBUF 16 +#define N_INBUF 16 + +#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(L1_CACHE_BYTES))) + struct hvc_struct { struct tty_port port; spinlock_t lock; int index; int do_wakeup; - char *outbuf; - int outbuf_size; int n_outbuf; uint32_t vtermno; const struct hv_ops *ops; @@ -48,6 +56,10 @@ struct hvc_struct { struct work_struct tty_resize; struct list_head next; unsigned long flags; + char out_ch; + char out_buf[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; + int outbuf_size; + char outbuf[0] __ALIGNED__; }; /* implemented by a low level driver */ -- 2.17.1