Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp268410pxb; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp7Y1lxpjfLjeDVT3tqHjC7Y8VemoeeFy5lN4+jvpehJIMGkzmz0C5P8kEw3/eZEajAplk X-Received: by 2002:a02:2307:: with SMTP id u7mr7081045jau.28.1629276338577; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629276338; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R5XgSWVGLT+rae+9s3ZIx0poXlDz1mXHFc+kn8Otxan1q+iMKtjEp2BZfbObyA21ie /BGnqaFBhc2KlEq9oMq/Rhn10TPu9OTkZw9yhzOTLo8sdQ2Uc7ye+IuSFi6N3LYCVcVN Gc5XWNpNHzDpd44S1yKcW0Zq6C8QxyrOkVJhrLWPBGoiL0uy3z0M3PL05WAhYOtiN6RL iwsTnDGItaxbeReZ2kVOJtN2xomjHqRekbK3H2LQj1UxesFZhj99xeqeqKFwQK2x9nhl CTYtWhXZGoeGM7lxjStMPKEd1IoCLXcI42tgRwxhBLlcB/2uUHBrxH523QiTneQCxvKK IyRg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=9LtWbaLwq6kJjM9ZOZwycFMBsFtGptd3p5wovzjNweE=; b=ZO2Yux08pifzFVMMPynleoKE3XvK/p2XUKGcfRM18p0hecmKMLlR9gz2yTk0wWnHbc RV8qd87zQFmAFqLQzj8En3C20oGLMG8ncCd9gc0QgNYUafFM4HlKjSpQE6mgxwu4AGJP a9QpXjfpPGLXt1xgOLKd4b4M9DCn0KZo/3iotma2G0Avb0ePIDoQsocLgTMhrFwD/GWs ja05hjw1e2XySLyehk+noD5gK2p2psQS07f3ezvcM8c97Gxjx5rt7/U+VJ08iU3Dba/D fjecvndUPrqNXxWbgyKokQiXM3e5r/0gd6U/0cppi0qorGcI3jklc1u/07SaEDVEAMQh 1cSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZJu2BdqG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x6si4824769ilu.80.2021.08.18.01.45.27; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZJu2BdqG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238995AbhHRIpO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 04:45:14 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:29311 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238500AbhHRIpM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 04:45:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629276277; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9LtWbaLwq6kJjM9ZOZwycFMBsFtGptd3p5wovzjNweE=; b=ZJu2BdqGbedwRHvFmmE18mwqLjNTJtjiMXwo0V4E5cYRAA1qOIsDS+oyvGTQriGjrNUmuv G2kPzAa5GSeHJsiFaSbnJzoBvT7kMErpAvn89ewvtKqD4ZqHTMNkkUWE2cA1yZIy3IWZJp EWmaVuP+NSp9Sy2yYiVbMR9p8cJvoR8= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-460-6bWBhUjCO_qi0-klC_6Zlg-1; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 04:44:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6bWBhUjCO_qi0-klC_6Zlg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id z186-20020a1c7ec30000b02902e6a27a9962so1992668wmc.3 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:44:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9LtWbaLwq6kJjM9ZOZwycFMBsFtGptd3p5wovzjNweE=; b=CijGgKBnM0FRog4nMXkkDdZ24FffErg0jtjOvkyGU8AVQRm2jndHc66uKbpQHageoH 9k1Ivku7Vf0ocsrGV65V+rPfQL/SHQ51ZGRGRUCzfQ5L/u6oZQF3MCTvAQP720K3mnZJ UkJ+/7PlLbARy9JoErCHrHdIpcc0Y9daCx033D14RUkMKMrNTMWYPGHl5NuPpCYfQzFO 9OfgIAIpSPud5TL2CfRqVP13JYp16gjo85j85BNaAoIpcw+nr3GW4hWh4kI3FZnwM0k2 8+riNaqsH/d1EpdxSBJP5CtCDK22L4wvmNuJdlvHH5TfyH0VOdG11QN+kgyBJ1QrXjfb 7goA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301wDtRGi2Z0/9Ng/eSEatB1rrPn9HbRYjIkcJbfNsEl9zKxy0+ qtvG0iddMa9kh1iQ9SbfHyXMy9U+rCF69Lb1Dd9Y0XbvVFgejQsEuhIeYuxYvtYPEWdMMiHffzN WO3z07z8LQkHk5tcfpokmsPteiGiAk9rFaXE41Ax01wYZTdobnGqbOVAcTSyZApSh6tvgc8nq X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4447:: with SMTP id x7mr9712626wrr.198.1629276275517; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:44:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4447:: with SMTP id x7mr9712609wrr.198.1629276275340; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p5b0c6417.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.100.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n188sm3452655wmn.48.2021.08.18.01.44.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: gaccess: Cleanup access to guest frames To: Janosch Frank , Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210816150718.3063877-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> <20210816150718.3063877-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com> <584ca757-4eb4-491e-a4cd-7bc60fb04b61@linux.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <0c800ed3-cc60-9c13-c0a7-8ba302365ccb@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:44:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <584ca757-4eb4-491e-a4cd-7bc60fb04b61@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.08.21 10:06, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 8/18/21 9:54 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.08.21 17:07, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: >>> Introduce a helper function for guest frame access. >>> Rewrite the calculation of the gpa and the length of the segment >>> to be more readable. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch > [...] >>> - unsigned long _len, gpa; >>> + unsigned long gpa; >>> + unsigned int seg; >>> int rc = 0; >>> >>> while (len && !rc) { >>> gpa = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, gra); >>> - _len = min(PAGE_SIZE - (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK), len); >>> - if (mode) >>> - rc = write_guest_abs(vcpu, gpa, data, _len); >>> - else >>> - rc = read_guest_abs(vcpu, gpa, data, _len); >>> - len -= _len; >>> - gra += _len; >>> - data += _len; >>> + seg = min(PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(gpa), len); >> >> What does "seg" mean? I certainly know when "len" means -- which is also >> what the function eats. > > What does "_len" mean especially in contrast to "len"? > > "seg" is used in the common kvm guest access functions so it's at least > consistent although I share the sentiment that it's not a great name for > the length we access inside the page. > > Originally I suggested "len_in_page" if you have a better name I'd > expect we'll both be happy to discuss it :-) Similar code I encountered in other places uses "len" vs "cur_len" or "total_len" vs. "cur_len". I agree that everything is better than "len" vs. "_len". I just cannot come up with a proper word for "seg" that would make sense. "Segment" ? Maybe my uneducated mind is missing some important English words that just fit perfectly here. Anyhow, just my 2 cents, you maintain this code :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb