Message-ID: <4573204D.4070608@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:06:53 -0600
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out
 [17/70]
References: <1164888933.3752.338.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>	<1165000744.1194.89.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com>	<20061201192555.GD3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>	<1165006331.1194.96.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com>	<20061201210849.GF3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>	<1165015786.1194.133.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com> <20061202011043.GG3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20061202011043.GG3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1080
Lines: 31

Al Viro wrote:

>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:29:46PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
>
>  
>
>>gfs2 is supposed to be stabilized and use-able for the up coming rhel5
>>release, not pretty up for somebody to print out and hang on their wall.
>>    
>>
>
>Your insight, sir, is truly stunning.  That is to say, it reminds of
>a sudden and unpleasant contact with something dense and misplaced.
>May I direct your attention to the fact that rhel5 is quite unlikely
>to be based on 2.6.20?
>  
>
Ok your right rhel5 has no bearing on what goes into 2.6.20.
And again I not taking issues with any of the cleanups you sent
in they were complete and addressed real potential problems.

Just trying to point out stablizing and bug fixing  over partial 
cleanups would be more helpful
for gfs2 in general,  for whatever kernel it is running in.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/