Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:15:23 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@google.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Complete prefetch for trailing SPTEs for
 direct, legacy MMU
Message-ID: <YR3a21l6TC/gmw3/@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210818235615.2047588-1-seanjc@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

[..]

> Make a final call to direct_pte_prefetch_many() if there are "trailing"
> SPTEs to prefetch, i.e. SPTEs for GFNs following the faulting GFN.  The
> call to direct_pte_prefetch_many() in the loop only handles the case
> where there are !PRESENT SPTEs preceding a PRESENT SPTE.
> 
> E.g. if the faulting GFN is a multiple of 8 (the prefetch size) and all
> SPTEs for the following GFNs are !PRESENT, the loop will terminate with
> "start = sptep+1" and not prefetch any SPTEs.
> 
> Prefetching trailing SPTEs as intended can drastically reduce the number
> of guest page faults, e.g. accessing the first byte of every 4kb page in
> a 6gb chunk of virtual memory, in a VM with 8gb of preallocated memory,
> the number of pf_fixed events observed in L0 drops from ~1.75M to <0.27M.
> 
> Note, this only affects memory that is backed by 4kb pages as KVM doesn't
> prefetch when installing hugepages.  Shadow paging prefetching is not
> affected as it does not batch the prefetches due to the need to process
> the corresponding guest PTE.  The TDP MMU is not affected because it
> doesn't have prefetching, yet...


Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>


I ran some tests.


- VM Boot up

From

EPT_VIOLATION    1192184    75.18%     4.40%      0.77us  18020.01us      4.32us ( +-   1.71% )

to

EPT_VIOLATION     947460    69.92%     4.64%      0.69us  34902.15us      5.06us ( +-   1.64% )


- Running test app (in VM)

From

EPT_VIOLATION    6550167    71.05%    11.76%      0.77us  32562.18us      3.51us ( +-   0.36% )

to

EPT_VIOLATION    5489904    68.32%    11.29%      0.71us  16564.19us      3.92us ( +-   0.29% )