Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1468441pxb; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:19:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1iIOETWtRZixbYzdw3RsqqnE4YPet6jaA56xCbR5Y5/n7CQPA/ApHUSn0RXW++0EddESP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1c08:: with SMTP id l8mr13647298ilh.134.1629465540636; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:19:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629465540; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ayohqDTYIjO5pQHiEXaZ3Tz0qj7kRCiOv/wnOWxE8591yjxyvMDLasWVCjbTT/JQu+ y8nPSYL2NEBIdVxnMyAtVu3y0cgQM+l72BumFmfCuoRvljRjzOgdaM43fADFHOMS3YOV TFxUZa+XoZMvSz58nuMvHbhKciU49oV6Kx1SWHSEaWiwfbO4CnVLM8+YvqZA3LLYAxLV ThQeWAeS/LZ9UqA/aK4amYWgpYUzahuRVfln+63oXSsgGa7h+X5sUWmdz0bhXtOGtQQM 7FeLLLZ9AHp0lMq/vE36SU0d0XbjTZP8oyh2QjWzmpG4uivH1Chkngm32sVvRJlvN10I ZDvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Wpck0e8AqvXN86BNbpcERlh1fNBjt0D/mM/a3eVJMzI=; b=JLyrW8h/LI8mAD9Pyt08NWwTalwnH5XtV6pZbHJ2sj1y9jtgJ/UQopIdQP7sa4hhcR R3NkB2Y+HvjEkX5E4hGK0ia/Ypx/eWI0KuzONBpz+uOt5JnBe4wv00rJM8UqKVsUIcID YB44gaIr/GFOZdu4QU6sqTGGsVaB91mEnsDZjlrYRLnCgQgQ6gySxk7FqQjxq0fTrHAU 0c4p6/CD6kvDKQZZsNx0GHwrA15TDwYaKXskQB2h8X+hFMe1TiPUIY+4eBGWL2APugWT Go/zrC/tfp7TG7sGPfTHG6H3JdAvEHFUeeFa29B/CQrzHLI+SXptdjeW6/uwBjoywzzW dUfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iPC+wmEW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g2si8244621ioo.75.2021.08.20.06.18.47; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iPC+wmEW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240260AbhHTNSe (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:18:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:47837 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240444AbhHTNSe (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:18:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629465475; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wpck0e8AqvXN86BNbpcERlh1fNBjt0D/mM/a3eVJMzI=; b=iPC+wmEWKYNEDPB2w58ETaypD/OXqHNiUs2nm74pHgd0JoHWN2SW5Ojs4xY4LHl8DfJ0Xx cwG1inSDh9Ksa2g/63yv+F3XVFL7e7Cq2EEFyWAgwm1KNIwtPVAF77gA08y12Fy/LQ+Hfo v5Cc159anMb0fN5tfRh6PeOoH6PgylE= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-462-XUbuth7gOMeZDUW0yIg0iw-1; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:17:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XUbuth7gOMeZDUW0yIg0iw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id q19-20020adfbb93000000b00156a96f5178so2819845wrg.11 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:17:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wpck0e8AqvXN86BNbpcERlh1fNBjt0D/mM/a3eVJMzI=; b=e+K/42S82mrERyxf6dPLv8iQzDqUI6zqNlQ80ujTl3C3eMFHiKbFmhabr/mcc6Ob0+ 4uDIXqWUy1HDOlIkkhGyp/qnHzmPhl+IchPN3JXNRLBVG62vdLCkvIdVFn6gMdg0SRel j9IAoQ1NCs2pOX2TrpWvQO+k/msRA+bH/IucwVP9aP6x50g2xWgtu/XuuTly1rfyr/5q I+xwePvvSzOxaJsFgdQkzNOIAYfIE7y5OoWlPccso//DROn5a1lML2bWGVR8WsaSy1U9 EWXVP7yTALr7rJ6pwaKtWk3bHkgtzHihLQ59nh0L++PF2vuqBvbm5C5nEr7xOG0mONeW Cxfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305xPO22j+AJQuOqbuw+c9tzNCjzimP4Fj1dnMV8wL6KYAsvfC4 cFqq2pmshszX4mu57brEwn6w2pcan/u+yXAOU6tuXXTzmfo0hphf44j8webrJ7T7s6hHbbAI18t RuV2YIEjarSEmRPuBaBf97jJHOaKNNJSTn8YzW7Th X-Received: by 2002:a5d:674b:: with SMTP id l11mr10096052wrw.357.1629465473178; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:674b:: with SMTP id l11mr10095989wrw.357.1629465472672; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:17:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210819194102.1491495-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20210819194102.1491495-11-agruenba@redhat.com> <5e8a20a8d45043e88013c6004636eae5dadc9be3.camel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5e8a20a8d45043e88013c6004636eae5dadc9be3.camel@redhat.com> From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:17:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6 10/19] gfs2: Introduce flag for glock holder auto-demotion To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jan Kara , LKML , Matthew Wilcox , cluster-devel , linux-fsdevel , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:35 AM Steven Whitehouse wrote: > On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 21:40 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > From: Bob Peterson > > > > This patch introduces a new HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag and infrastructure > > that will allow glocks to be demoted automatically on locking conflicts. > > When a locking request comes in that isn't compatible with the locking > > state of a holder and that holder has the HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag set, the > > holder will be demoted automatically before the incoming locking request > > is granted. > > I'm not sure I understand what is going on here. When there are locking > conflicts we generate call backs and those result in glock demotion. > There is no need for a flag to indicate that I think, since it is the > default behaviour anyway. Or perhaps the explanation is just a bit > confusing... When a glock has active holders (with the HIF_HOLDER flag set), the glock won't be demoted to a state incompatible with any of those holders. > > Processes that allow a glock holder to be taken away indicate this by > > calling gfs2_holder_allow_demote(). When they need the glock again, > > they call gfs2_holder_disallow_demote() and then they check if the > > holder is still queued: if it is, they're still holding the glock; if > > it isn't, they need to re-acquire the glock. > > > > This allows processes to hang on to locks that could become part of a > > cyclic locking dependency. The locks will be given up when a (rare) > > conflicting locking request occurs, and don't need to be given up > > prematurely. > > This seems backwards to me. We already have the glock layer cache the > locks until they are required by another node. We also have the min > hold time to make sure that we don't bounce locks too much. So what is > the problem that you are trying to solve here I wonder? This solves the problem of faulting in pages during read and write operations: on the one hand, we want to hold the inode glock across those operations. On the other hand, those operations may fault in pages, which may require taking the same or other inode glocks, directly or indirectly, which can deadlock. So before we fault in pages, we indicate with gfs2_holder_allow_demote(gh) that we can cope if the glock is taken away from us. After faulting in the pages, we indicate with gfs2_holder_disallow_demote(gh) that we now actually need the glock again. At that point, we either still have the glock (i.e., the holder is still queued and it has the HIF_HOLDER flag set), or we don't. The different kinds of read and write operations differ in how they handle the latter case: * When a buffered read or write loses the inode glock, it returns a short result. This prevents torn writes and reading things that have never existed on disk in that form. * When a direct read or write loses the inode glock, it re-acquires it before resuming the operation. Direct I/O is not expected to return partial results and doesn't provide any kind of synchronization among processes. We could solve this kind of problem in other ways, for example, by keeping a glock generation number, dropping the glock before faulting in pages, re-acquiring it afterwards, and checking if the generation number has changed. This would still be an additional piece of glock infrastructure, but more heavyweight than the HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag which uses the existing glock holder infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson > > --- > > fs/gfs2/glock.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > ---- > > fs/gfs2/glock.h | 20 +++++ > > fs/gfs2/incore.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c > > index f24db2ececfb..d1b06a09ce2f 100644 > > --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c > > +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct gfs2_glock_iter { > > typedef void (*glock_examiner) (struct gfs2_glock * gl); > > > > static void do_xmote(struct gfs2_glock *gl, struct gfs2_holder *gh, > > unsigned int target); > > +static void __gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh); > > > > static struct dentry *gfs2_root; > > static struct workqueue_struct *glock_workqueue; > > @@ -197,6 +198,12 @@ static int demote_ok(const struct gfs2_glock > > *gl) > > > > if (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_UNLOCKED) > > return 0; > > + /* > > + * Note that demote_ok is used for the lru process of disposing > > of > > + * glocks. For this purpose, we don't care if the glock's > > holders > > + * have the HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag set or not. If someone is using > > + * them, don't demote. > > + */ > > if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_holders)) > > return 0; > > if (glops->go_demote_ok) > > @@ -379,7 +386,7 @@ static void do_error(struct gfs2_glock *gl, const > > int ret) > > struct gfs2_holder *gh, *tmp; > > > > list_for_each_entry_safe(gh, tmp, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > - if (test_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + if (!test_bit(HIF_WAIT, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > continue; > > if (ret & LM_OUT_ERROR) > > gh->gh_error = -EIO; > > @@ -393,6 +400,40 @@ static void do_error(struct gfs2_glock *gl, > > const int ret) > > } > > } > > > > +/** > > + * demote_incompat_holders - demote incompatible demoteable holders > > + * @gl: the glock we want to promote > > + * @new_gh: the new holder to be promoted > > + */ > > +static void demote_incompat_holders(struct gfs2_glock *gl, > > + struct gfs2_holder *new_gh) > > +{ > > + struct gfs2_holder *gh; > > + > > + /* > > + * Demote incompatible holders before we make ourselves > > eligible. > > + * (This holder may or may not allow auto-demoting, but we > > don't want > > + * to demote the new holder before it's even granted.) > > + */ > > + list_for_each_entry(gh, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > + /* > > + * Since holders are at the front of the list, we stop > > when we > > + * find the first non-holder. > > + */ > > + if (!test_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + return; > > + if (test_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh->gh_iflags) && > > + !may_grant(gl, new_gh, gh)) { > > + /* > > + * We should not recurse into do_promote > > because > > + * __gfs2_glock_dq only calls handle_callback, > > + * gfs2_glock_add_to_lru and > > __gfs2_glock_queue_work. > > + */ > > + __gfs2_glock_dq(gh); > > + } > > + } > > +} > > + > > /** > > * find_first_holder - find the first "holder" gh > > * @gl: the glock > > @@ -411,6 +452,26 @@ static inline struct gfs2_holder > > *find_first_holder(const struct gfs2_glock *gl) > > return NULL; > > } > > > > +/** > > + * find_first_strong_holder - find the first non-demoteable holder > > + * @gl: the glock > > + * > > + * Find the first holder that doesn't have the HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag > > set. > > + */ > > +static inline struct gfs2_holder > > +*find_first_strong_holder(struct gfs2_glock *gl) > > +{ > > + struct gfs2_holder *gh; > > + > > + list_for_each_entry(gh, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > + if (!test_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + return NULL; > > + if (!test_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + return gh; > > + } > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > /** > > * do_promote - promote as many requests as possible on the current > > queue > > * @gl: The glock > > @@ -425,15 +486,27 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock) > > { > > const struct gfs2_glock_operations *glops = gl->gl_ops; > > struct gfs2_holder *gh, *tmp, *first_gh; > > + bool incompat_holders_demoted = false; > > int ret; > > > > - first_gh = find_first_holder(gl); > > + first_gh = find_first_strong_holder(gl); > > > > restart: > > list_for_each_entry_safe(gh, tmp, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > - if (test_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + if (!test_bit(HIF_WAIT, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > continue; > > if (may_grant(gl, first_gh, gh)) { > > + if (!incompat_holders_demoted) { > > + demote_incompat_holders(gl, first_gh); > > + incompat_holders_demoted = true; > > + first_gh = gh; > > + } > > + /* > > + * The first holder (and only the first holder) > > on the > > + * list to be promoted needs to call the > > go_lock > > + * function. This does things like > > inode_refresh > > + * to read an inode from disk. > > + */ > > if (gh->gh_list.prev == &gl->gl_holders && > > glops->go_lock) { > > spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > @@ -459,6 +532,11 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock) > > gfs2_holder_wake(gh); > > continue; > > } > > + /* > > + * If we get here, it means we may not grant this > > holder for > > + * some reason. If this holder is the head of the list, > > it > > + * means we have a blocked holder at the head, so > > return 1. > > + */ > > if (gh->gh_list.prev == &gl->gl_holders) > > return 1; > > do_error(gl, 0); > > @@ -1373,7 +1451,7 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock) > > if (test_bit(GLF_LOCK, &gl->gl_flags)) { > > struct gfs2_holder *first_gh; > > > > - first_gh = find_first_holder(gl); > > + first_gh = find_first_strong_holder(gl); > > try_futile = !may_grant(gl, first_gh, gh); > > } > > if (test_bit(GLF_INVALIDATE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl- > > >gl_flags)) > > @@ -1382,7 +1460,8 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_lockref.lock) > > > > list_for_each_entry(gh2, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > if (unlikely(gh2->gh_owner_pid == gh->gh_owner_pid && > > - (gh->gh_gl->gl_ops->go_type != LM_TYPE_FLOCK))) > > + (gh->gh_gl->gl_ops->go_type != LM_TYPE_FLOCK) && > > + !test_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh2->gh_iflags))) > > goto trap_recursive; > > if (try_futile && > > !(gh2->gh_flags & (LM_FLAG_TRY | LM_FLAG_TRY_1CB))) > > { > > @@ -1478,51 +1557,83 @@ int gfs2_glock_poll(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > return test_bit(HIF_WAIT, &gh->gh_iflags) ? 0 : 1; > > } > > > > -/** > > - * gfs2_glock_dq - dequeue a struct gfs2_holder from a glock > > (release a glock) > > - * @gh: the glock holder > > - * > > - */ > > +static inline bool needs_demote(struct gfs2_glock *gl) > > +{ > > + return (test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags) || > > + test_bit(GLF_PENDING_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags)); > > +} > > > > -void gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > +static void __gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > { > > struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl; > > struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_name.ln_sbd; > > unsigned delay = 0; > > int fast_path = 0; > > > > - spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > /* > > - * If we're in the process of file system withdraw, we cannot > > just > > - * dequeue any glocks until our journal is recovered, lest we > > - * introduce file system corruption. We need two exceptions to > > this > > - * rule: We need to allow unlocking of nondisk glocks and the > > glock > > - * for our own journal that needs recovery. > > + * This while loop is similar to function > > demote_incompat_holders: > > + * If the glock is due to be demoted (which may be from another > > node > > + * or even if this holder is GL_NOCACHE), the weak holders are > > + * demoted as well, allowing the glock to be demoted. > > */ > > - if (test_bit(SDF_WITHDRAW_RECOVERY, &sdp->sd_flags) && > > - glock_blocked_by_withdraw(gl) && > > - gh->gh_gl != sdp->sd_jinode_gl) { > > - sdp->sd_glock_dqs_held++; > > - spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > - might_sleep(); > > - wait_on_bit(&sdp->sd_flags, SDF_WITHDRAW_RECOVERY, > > - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); > > - spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > - } > > - if (gh->gh_flags & GL_NOCACHE) > > - handle_callback(gl, LM_ST_UNLOCKED, 0, false); > > + while (gh) { > > + /* > > + * If we're in the process of file system withdraw, we > > cannot > > + * just dequeue any glocks until our journal is > > recovered, lest > > + * we introduce file system corruption. We need two > > exceptions > > + * to this rule: We need to allow unlocking of nondisk > > glocks > > + * and the glock for our own journal that needs > > recovery. > > + */ > > + if (test_bit(SDF_WITHDRAW_RECOVERY, &sdp->sd_flags) && > > + glock_blocked_by_withdraw(gl) && > > + gh->gh_gl != sdp->sd_jinode_gl) { > > + sdp->sd_glock_dqs_held++; > > + spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > + might_sleep(); > > + wait_on_bit(&sdp->sd_flags, > > SDF_WITHDRAW_RECOVERY, > > + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); > > + spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * This holder should not be cached, so mark it for > > demote. > > + * Note: this should be done before the check for > > needs_demote > > + * below. > > + */ > > + if (gh->gh_flags & GL_NOCACHE) > > + handle_callback(gl, LM_ST_UNLOCKED, 0, false); > > > > - list_del_init(&gh->gh_list); > > - clear_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags); > > - if (list_empty(&gl->gl_holders) && > > - !test_bit(GLF_PENDING_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags) && > > - !test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags)) > > - fast_path = 1; > > + list_del_init(&gh->gh_list); > > + clear_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags); > > + trace_gfs2_glock_queue(gh, 0); > > + > > + /* > > + * If there hasn't been a demote request we are done. > > + * (Let the remaining holders, if any, keep holding > > it.) > > + */ > > + if (!needs_demote(gl)) { > > + if (list_empty(&gl->gl_holders)) > > + fast_path = 1; > > + break; > > + } > > + /* > > + * If we have another strong holder (we cannot auto- > > demote) > > + * we are done. It keeps holding it until it is done. > > + */ > > + if (find_first_strong_holder(gl)) > > + break; > > + > > + /* > > + * If we have a weak holder at the head of the list, it > > + * (and all others like it) must be auto-demoted. If > > there > > + * are no more weak holders, we exit the while loop. > > + */ > > + gh = find_first_holder(gl); > > + } > > > > if (!test_bit(GLF_LFLUSH, &gl->gl_flags) && demote_ok(gl)) > > gfs2_glock_add_to_lru(gl); > > > > - trace_gfs2_glock_queue(gh, 0); > > if (unlikely(!fast_path)) { > > gl->gl_lockref.count++; > > if (test_bit(GLF_PENDING_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags) && > > @@ -1531,6 +1642,19 @@ void gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > delay = gl->gl_hold_time; > > __gfs2_glock_queue_work(gl, delay); > > } > > +} > > + > > +/** > > + * gfs2_glock_dq - dequeue a struct gfs2_holder from a glock > > (release a glock) > > + * @gh: the glock holder > > + * > > + */ > > +void gfs2_glock_dq(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > +{ > > + struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl; > > + > > + spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > + __gfs2_glock_dq(gh); > > spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > } > > > > @@ -1693,6 +1817,7 @@ void gfs2_glock_dq_m(unsigned int num_gh, > > struct gfs2_holder *ghs) > > > > void gfs2_glock_cb(struct gfs2_glock *gl, unsigned int state) > > { > > + struct gfs2_holder mock_gh = { .gh_gl = gl, .gh_state = state, > > }; > > unsigned long delay = 0; > > unsigned long holdtime; > > unsigned long now = jiffies; > > @@ -1707,6 +1832,28 @@ void gfs2_glock_cb(struct gfs2_glock *gl, > > unsigned int state) > > if (test_bit(GLF_REPLY_PENDING, &gl->gl_flags)) > > delay = gl->gl_hold_time; > > } > > + /* > > + * Note 1: We cannot call demote_incompat_holders from > > handle_callback > > + * or gfs2_set_demote due to recursion problems like: > > gfs2_glock_dq -> > > + * handle_callback -> demote_incompat_holders -> gfs2_glock_dq > > + * Plus, we only want to demote the holders if the request > > comes from > > + * a remote cluster node because local holder conflicts are > > resolved > > + * elsewhere. > > + * > > + * Note 2: if a remote node wants this glock in EX mode, > > lock_dlm will > > + * request that we set our state to UNLOCKED. Here we mock up a > > holder > > + * to make it look like someone wants the lock EX locally. Any > > SH > > + * and DF requests should be able to share the lock without > > demoting. > > + * > > + * Note 3: We only want to demote the demoteable holders when > > there > > + * are no more strong holders. The demoteable holders might as > > well > > + * keep the glock until the last strong holder is done with it. > > + */ > > + if (!find_first_strong_holder(gl)) { > > + if (state == LM_ST_UNLOCKED) > > + mock_gh.gh_state = LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE; > > + demote_incompat_holders(gl, &mock_gh); > > + } > > handle_callback(gl, state, delay, true); > > __gfs2_glock_queue_work(gl, delay); > > spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > @@ -2096,6 +2243,8 @@ static const char *hflags2str(char *buf, u16 > > flags, unsigned long iflags) > > *p++ = 'H'; > > if (test_bit(HIF_WAIT, &iflags)) > > *p++ = 'W'; > > + if (test_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &iflags)) > > + *p++ = 'D'; > > *p = 0; > > return buf; > > } > > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.h b/fs/gfs2/glock.h > > index 31a8f2f649b5..9012487da4c6 100644 > > --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.h > > +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.h > > @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ static inline struct gfs2_holder > > *gfs2_glock_is_locked_by_me(struct gfs2_glock * > > list_for_each_entry(gh, &gl->gl_holders, gh_list) { > > if (!test_bit(HIF_HOLDER, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > break; > > + if (test_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh->gh_iflags)) > > + continue; > > if (gh->gh_owner_pid == pid) > > goto out; > > } > > @@ -325,6 +327,24 @@ static inline void glock_clear_object(struct > > gfs2_glock *gl, void *object) > > spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > } > > > > +static inline void gfs2_holder_allow_demote(struct gfs2_holder *gh) > > +{ > > + struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl; > > + > > + spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > + set_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh->gh_iflags); > > + spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void gfs2_holder_disallow_demote(struct gfs2_holder > > *gh) > > +{ > > + struct gfs2_glock *gl = gh->gh_gl; > > + > > + spin_lock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > + clear_bit(HIF_MAY_DEMOTE, &gh->gh_iflags); > > + spin_unlock(&gl->gl_lockref.lock); > > +} > > + > > This looks a bit strange... bit operations are atomic anyway, so why do > we need that spinlock here? This is about making sure that the glock state engine will make consistent decisions. Currently, those decisions are made under that spin lock. We could set the HIF_MAY_DEMOTE flag followed by a memory barrier and the glock state engine would *probably* still make the right decisions most of the time, but that's not easy to ensure anymore. We surely want to prevent the glock state engine from making changes while clearing the flag, though. > Steve. > > > extern void gfs2_inode_remember_delete(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 > > generation); > > extern bool gfs2_inode_already_deleted(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 > > generation); > > > > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/incore.h b/fs/gfs2/incore.h > > index 5c6b985254aa..e73a81db0714 100644 > > --- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h > > +++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h > > @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct gfs2_lkstats { > > > > enum { > > /* States */ > > + HIF_MAY_DEMOTE = 1, > > HIF_HOLDER = 6, /* Set for gh that "holds" the > > glock */ > > HIF_WAIT = 10, > > }; > Thanks, Andreas