Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1471928pxb; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:22:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuFct90jQdyWW83v0UsaVKRyMYL2WIV90sRobpzluxq56QuHCMyn8D+FxmrNbt9AX/cFjv X-Received: by 2002:a5d:668c:: with SMTP id l12mr10217117wru.84.1629465779482; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:22:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629465779; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cKI5dGyG+zMjDztSlIppYCPXstv8lIoUTxA57IXH1aJG32tTGEx18qHmxdNLBnvw3+ pm0SWH9DezZzvW9fmVCB5J5w+F2asfnezK7Qfnq42iA7shM7chZIPwKupRH7UJngxxsa 6OhW8xcqCZN+SWqR0cAv0E60wLHZHw9tm/Mz9bvLVmWH0jrH5T+lfnLDYjKxCtVYQ/lT D+m4JaP/dsHG1u4ENpdgTbzrVFrGUqhmwmeBq4M2b4BvRqSNTA4342taZcGQe1PFxz1G yFnAi3YnzXhTVKp8XsMZ1JO1LuxxKTEplc4Z7LzwKn+2AofD9n/VQ9Fu4hjmTCbojo+N 9DQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=5bWPXBCxvgM+GCgLXAwumIKTWMxhDZ7a4zxHkUxLO4I=; b=mr5F835LNW8sQd1mGSANGr25hgYj4G8TWYqyjynYUgSpnYxtFPfbATNMsSch465g1x NYgbwWDknagGG7cZ/lOa0pEkKG0CwsFM+grx7OJ8I6S3HaZ0l10OPhdiOpwfKl7BmGEP o6tOKjWd5qHvd60jpFXUtza8XntkVEWc+9Fykci6tPEElb7OguTj2B+wSMabvI1UGdVm OmB4HOcZrcY2A3L0xeg3Z/t9icfh4TNdQ1cfLbHtjoqgKZparh/LEOcHErA6dnynkg8c CDc8A00ejqeqE+LhG37fgt6hN/Drr5/FAWxoqN3aek3b/ZJdNBelWgwmRwC9f5Qsntfq 7GkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hd44si4304082ejc.260.2021.08.20.06.22.23; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240708AbhHTNU3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:20:29 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:40791 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238228AbhHTNU2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:20:28 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10081"; a="196352086" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,337,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="196352086" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 06:19:36 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,337,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="532989108" Received: from junli5-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.209.215]) ([10.254.209.215]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 06:19:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] IPI virtualization support for VM To: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Hansen , "Luck, Tony" , Kan Liang , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kim Phillips , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jethro Beekman , "Huang, Kai" Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Hu, Robert" , "Gao, Chao" References: <20210809032925.3548-1-guang.zeng@intel.com> From: Zeng Guang Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:19:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210809032925.3548-1-guang.zeng@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/9/2021 11:29 AM, Zeng, Guang wrote: Gentle ping. @Paolo, @Sean, @All maintainers Appreciated if any comment to improve this patch set.  Hope it could be accepted soon. :) Thanks. > Current IPI process in guest VM will virtualize the writing to interrupt > command register(ICR) of the local APIC which will cause VM-exit anyway > on source vCPU. Frequent VM-exit could induce much overhead accumulated > if running IPI intensive task. > > IPI virtualization as a new VT-x feature targets to eliminate VM-exits > when issuing IPI on source vCPU. It introduces a new VM-execution > control - "IPI virtualization"(bit4) in the tertiary processor-based > VM-execution controls and a new data structure - "PID-pointer table > address" and "Last PID-pointer index" referenced by the VMCS. When "IPI > virtualization" is enabled, processor emulates following kind of writes > to APIC registers that would send IPIs, moreover without causing VM-exits. > - Memory-mapped ICR writes > - MSR-mapped ICR writes > - SENDUIPI execution > > This patch series implements IPI virtualization support in KVM. > > Patches 1-4 add tertiary processor-based VM-execution support > framework. > > Patch 5 implements interrupt dispatch support in x2APIC mode with > APIC-write VM exit. In previous platform, no CPU would produce > APIC-write VM exit with exit qualification 300H when the "virtual x2APIC > mode" VM-execution control was 1. > > Patch 6 implement IPI virtualization related function including > feature enabling through tertiary processor-based VM-execution in > various scenarios of VMCS configuration, PID table setup in vCPU creation > and vCPU block consideration. > > Document for IPI virtualization is now available at the latest "Intel > Architecture Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference". > > Document Link: > https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html > > We did experiment to measure average time sending IPI from source vCPU > to the target vCPU completing the IPI handling by kvm unittest w/ and > w/o IPI virtualization. When IPI virtualization enabled, it will reduce > 22.21% and 15.98% cycles consuming in xAPIC mode and x2APIC mode > respectively. > > KVM unittest:vmexit/ipi, 2 vCPU, AP was modified to run in idle loop > instead of halt to ensure no VM exit impact on target vCPU. > > Cycles of IPI > xAPIC mode x2APIC mode > test w/o IPIv w/ IPIv w/o IPIv w/ IPIv > 1 6106 4816 4265 3768 > 2 6244 4656 4404 3546 > 3 6165 4658 4233 3474 > 4 5992 4710 4363 3430 > 5 6083 4741 4215 3551 > 6 6238 4904 4304 3547 > 7 6164 4617 4263 3709 > 8 5984 4763 4518 3779 > 9 5931 4712 4645 3667 > 10 5955 4530 4332 3724 > 11 5897 4673 4283 3569 > 12 6140 4794 4178 3598 > 13 6183 4728 4363 3628 > 14 5991 4994 4509 3842 > 15 5866 4665 4520 3739 > 16 6032 4654 4229 3701 > 17 6050 4653 4185 3726 > 18 6004 4792 4319 3746 > 19 5961 4626 4196 3392 > 20 6194 4576 4433 3760 > > Average cycles 6059 4713.1 4337.85 3644.8 > %Reduction -22.21% -15.98% > > -------------------------------------- > IPI microbenchmark: > (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20171219085010.4081-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com) > > 2 vCPUs, 1:1 pin vCPU to pCPU, guest VM runs with idle=poll, x2APIC mode > > Result with IPIv enabled: > > Dry-run: 0, 272798 ns > Self-IPI: 5094123, 11114037 ns > Normal IPI: 131697087, 173321200 ns > Broadcast IPI: 0, 155649075 ns > Broadcast lock: 0, 161518031 ns > > Result with IPIv disabled: > > Dry-run: 0, 272766 ns > Self-IPI: 5091788, 11123699 ns > Normal IPI: 145215772, 174558920 ns > Broadcast IPI: 0, 175785384 ns > Broadcast lock: 0, 149076195 ns > > > As IPIv can benefit unicast IPI to other CPU, Normal IPI test case gain > about 9.73% time saving on average out of 15 test runs when IPIv is > enabled. > > Normal IPI statistics (unit:ns): > test w/o IPIv w/ IPIv > 1 153346049 140907046 > 2 147218648 141660618 > 3 145215772 117890672 > 4 146621682 136430470 > 5 144821472 136199421 > 6 144704378 131676928 > 7 141403224 131697087 > 8 144775766 125476250 > 9 140658192 137263330 > 10 144768626 138593127 > 11 145166679 131946752 > 12 145020451 116852889 > 13 148161353 131406280 > 14 148378655 130174353 > 15 148903652 127969674 > > Average time 145944306.6 131742993.1 ns > %Reduction -9.73% > > -------------------------------------- > hackbench: > > 8 vCPUs, guest VM free run, x2APIC mode > ./hackbench -p -l 100000 > > w/o IPIv w/ IPIv > Time 91.887 74.605 > %Reduction -18.808% > > 96 vCPUs, guest VM free run, x2APIC mode > ./hackbench -p -l 1000000 > > w/o IPIv w/ IPIv > Time 287.504 235.185 > %Reduction -18.198% > > -------------------------------------- > v3 -> v4: > 1. Refine code style of patch 2 > 2. Move tertiary control shadow build into patch 3 > 3. Make vmx_tertiary_exec_control to be static function > > v2 -> v3: > 1. Misc change on tertiary execution control > definition and capability setup > 2. Alternative to get tertiary execution > control configuration > > v1 -> v2: > 1. Refine the IPIv enabling logic for VM. > Remove ipiv_active definition per vCPU. > > Gao Chao (1): > KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization > > Robert Hoo (4): > x86/feat_ctl: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control > KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit > variation > KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config > KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well > > Zeng Guang (1): > KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM > exit > > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 + > arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 11 +++ > arch/x86/include/asm/vmxfeatures.h | 5 +- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/feat_ctl.c | 11 ++- > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 9 ++- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 14 ++++ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 2 + > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h | 1 + > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c | 22 ++++-- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 1 + > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 55 ++++++++------ > 12 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) >