Message-ID: <4574487F.7040805@nortel.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:10:39 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050427 Red Hat/1.7.7-1.1.3.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Aucoin@Houston.RR.com
CC: "'Kyle Moffett'" <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
       "'Tim Schmielau'" <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
       "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>, torvalds@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: la la la la ... swappiness
References: <200612041439.kB4EdGFn025092@ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <200612041439.kB4EdGFn025092@ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 963
Lines: 24

Aucoin wrote:

> The definition of perfectly good here may be up for debate or
> someone can explain it to me. This perfectly good data was
> cached under the tar yet hours after the tar has completed the
> pages are still cached.

If nothing else has asked for that memory since the tar, there is no 
reason to evict the pages from the cache.  The inactive memory is 
basically "free, but still contains the previous data".

If anything asks for memory, those pages will be filled with zeros or 
the new information.  In the meantime, the kernel keeps them in the 
cache in case anyone wants the old information.

It doesn't hurt anything to keep the pages around with the old data in 
them--and it might help.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/