Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] sched: Introduce migratable()
In-Reply-To: <20210817144348.kkgoytuz3766jeoz@linutronix.de>
References: <20210811201354.1976839-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210811201354.1976839-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210817144348.kkgoytuz3766jeoz@linutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 22 Aug 2021 18:31:11 +0100
Message-ID: <87h7fh75eo.mognet@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 17/08/21 16:43, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-08-11 21:13:52 [+0100], Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index debc960f41e3..8ba7b4a7ee69 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -1715,6 +1715,16 @@ static inline bool is_percpu_thread(void)
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>
>> +/* Is the current task guaranteed to stay on its current CPU? */
>> +static inline bool migratable(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +	return preemptible() && !current->migration_disabled;
>> +#else
>> +	return true;
>
> shouldn't this be false in the UP case?
>

Yes indeed, forgot to flip that one when inverting the logic.