Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:19:25 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
        Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>,
        Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Handle update hardware queues and queue freeze
 more carefully
Message-ID: <YSNoHVsQXKqmJ9nO@infradead.org>
References: <20210818120530.130501-1-dwagner@suse.de>
 <YSNV6vpaEnzc0Yv4@infradead.org>
 <20210823091405.pmmkubzgxodwgjij@carbon.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210823091405.pmmkubzgxodwgjij@carbon.lan>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:01:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > applied to nvme-5.15.
> 
> Could you drop these patches again? James just sent me a new version of
> the series which addresses the points we discussed in this thread. They
> look good to me but I'd like to give them a spin and will post them
> shortly. Also James is giving them a test run.

Ok.