Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1881267pxb; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 06:53:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8RriNXAwSJH6WbBEbcwGl1/0UoOTqpkppjXruE+Ui0+ofSInFpglBiGjVL0rn5sSyqfp9 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8990:: with SMTP id m16mr26648026iol.170.1629726819887; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 06:53:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629726819; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wwMQRsP8L6zN6NV3e5xRzb7ppOcmeMWZHv/ihiJKZPt0I/iZBGB0Vk4xJ+QpIprNBC +LVwQBI7Kjbd5TdgZ53kb73JQZm6Sv9KI0h0yKYVyPLMKpqGTBd4aZBu7UOx3K8HW3j1 H/xjsqjKsBtMLG9MEzeQVxYnLAOT8WxF+ag6v7h4Qs0G9B206EYWzGWHhtnzxRIeTCZw M1+DysVdlRCELxAgG6HKh6itsQz/phBPy153w6fHrtVAy67q7UCOrkF8KkfSNiu7enaL IEC74IU1xK3bLJHV/cHGuqlgKn7/3yHnU+3/e1S158TUorzavToktWtB86kvU+S7+lzE ABhw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=nTLJWAuyL4MI6yqzklOk75i0P39xQpeUyFVilv1SoK8=; b=ac6GTIQ7404FpWBd6/WkXDQE8udGE82JAdi5CPKsZ+9R8QM2gqJ3bg8GofLAG93cyM V3+JYhX9L16ai7PuldUurQdzFuoOGLvWjXWJHqYui/rFlqP5ztqQiN5VZNUzBR4GvQyb cXBJDSKjHTGWOgE2gIls1F688zaDDfBnkR/mSQgWvj9/I7nlv2m33M/8ZfWcWPZ4v3QJ 9NygFVVoRHIuBSdUSG9MLrRjwLYwS6fQ++IFnhyoVKRltV0oQN6SemCTaIS0ELGu4jf9 q5oCWCvQf5qbuamPgBoliB0Z9rjh95CxekHX93abbKYwtVF2cK2IabdiGzYBOf+McCbS Vmcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j19si14873365iow.12.2021.08.23.06.53.27; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 06:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229760AbhHWNxF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:53:05 -0400 Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com ([221.176.66.81]:64763 "EHLO cmccmta3.chinamobile.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229477AbhHWNxE (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:53:04 -0400 Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.9]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app11-12011 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eeb6123a804ec8-05972; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:52:04 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eeb6123a804ec8-05972 X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from [192.168.26.114] (unknown[10.42.68.12]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee56123a803594-cd5d4; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:52:04 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee56123a803594-cd5d4 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] can: mscan: mpc5xxx_can: Useof_device_get_match_data to simplify code To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: davem@davemloft.net, wg@grandegger.com, kuba@kernel.org, kevinbrace@bracecomputerlab.com, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210823113338.3568-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> <20210823113338.3568-4-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> <20210823123715.j4khoyld5mfl6kdv@pengutronix.de> From: tangbin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:52:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210823123715.j4khoyld5mfl6kdv@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc: On 2021/8/23 20:37, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 23.08.2021 19:33:38, Tang Bin wrote: >> Retrieve OF match data, it's better and cleaner to use >> 'of_device_get_match_data' over 'of_match_device'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin > Thanks for the patch! > > LGTM, comment inside. > >> --- >> drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c >> index e254e04ae..3b7465acd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c >> @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static u32 mpc512x_can_get_clock(struct platform_device *ofdev, >> static const struct of_device_id mpc5xxx_can_table[]; >> static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) >> { >> - const struct of_device_id *match; >> const struct mpc5xxx_can_data *data; >> struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node; >> struct net_device *dev; >> @@ -289,10 +288,9 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) >> int irq, mscan_clksrc = 0; >> int err = -ENOMEM; >> >> - match = of_match_device(mpc5xxx_can_table, &ofdev->dev); >> - if (!match) >> + data = of_device_get_match_data(&ofdev->dev); >> + if (!data) >> return -EINVAL; > Please remove the "BUG_ON(!data)", which comes later. For this place, may I send another patch to fix this 'BUG_ON()' by itself, not in this patch series? Thanks Tang Bin > >> - data = match->data; >> >> base = of_iomap(np, 0); >> if (!base) { >> -- >> 2.20.1.windows.1 >> >> >> >> > regards, > Marc >