Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp2387949pxb; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcsC9O6nbInNKWa64MqaJeMsjvNfIIvSZ4A9A3ym+dpP6fY5WQFqbmxHJhwNcRbLhaDlGD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:483:: with SMTP id k3mr27820991edv.155.1629775694441; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629775694; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yvSa0eIsO/Wm5Fxhvgjv3KF2I4JImDtPFU3dyPfHGg6qHx4eOcZfUfg4DSW4DEDbG8 7qIophYvnalQ64RLrzQ+9koCkmDluzTM2gkmARVyne2k2rVGMOlPNUcd4yg1fV72hgGR eikZ35jUvgq6W8bk3ppYKo9Ses2mMsHWh8t/XBLHOKbrNePd3FQC5tgQ5Qt8B4qYBBwV 9XatrtOUxdBYc5dJgzaIB5i0nufQtcWxLJPFvAAMEscGiOOgmWIe437rdzSEGeQN3tVS 0K4vbYEbI+R0LRT6OeywmHiUmYymRLKj9DufrxS1eKWlvPqXBjSs5GpkmamOYJEjXLuj G/Fg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:cc:to:from; bh=eH9gw6mmD6vA5ARlFMzw/Q8K0Oy+AFhIfiryuaa2lLc=; b=B/grNLAwJDx3BMNLZy4/n4rkbUggBwk0KK3z6MrPn8IUCFeFDPCeP3PaYN3B3VbhNX N5/i1xnqhILUjRta1fWOg6mVbPa1dBdEDdjRONjOejIa4DePHV+RgHGzNj4KhDE9Vmw9 H9A79B8rEiZRAPqCwmX7DRc77NOzznWG8CoAsgOQZD80FEekKL7rjoaUwhFfIZ6TsIYZ j+KAMuDKnmKTVeDDt0qR+U9Ev9HTX6aT+nrQDpblLsMviK+kk120u0/9/uOm0WKQvJhK RB7sR7IX/8MRL/9pLNR3Q5FfY/5Q7AqJIt5JcuPnDnrdGd1ICWqQAiCONkxxyag6RtTw eL1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10si4497112edf.117.2021.08.23.20.27.50; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233997AbhHXD0H (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:26:07 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:35716 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232605AbhHXD0G (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:26:06 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:37352) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mIN3u-007tiF-D4; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:25:18 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:47806 helo=email.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mIN3h-008tKu-MV; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:25:11 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Ma\, XinjianX" Cc: Alexey Gladkov , "linux-kselftest\@vger.kernel.org" , lkp , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "axboe\@kernel.dk" , "christian.brauner\@ubuntu.com" , "containers\@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "jannh\@google.com" , "keescook\@chromium.org" , "kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm\@kvack.org" , "oleg\@redhat.com" , "torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" In-Reply-To: <06bb27f1d79243febf9ddc4633c4e084@intel.com> (XinjianX Ma's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:19:52 +0000") References: <87a6lgysxp.fsf@disp2133> <20210818131117.x7omzb2wkjq7le3s@example.org> <87o89ttqql.fsf@disp2133> <20210819172618.qwrrw4m7wt33wfmz@example.org> <87eeajswfc.fsf_-_@disp2133> <06bb27f1d79243febf9ddc4633c4e084@intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:24:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mIN3h-008tKu-MV;;;mid=<87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1++AiEZW5KIHsfe2U3AKqShPsf05OHNwZw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong,XM_Body_Dirty_Words autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4999] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 1.0 XM_Body_Dirty_Words Contains a dirty word X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;"Ma\, XinjianX" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 2130 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (0.6%), b_tie_ro: 11 (0.5%), parse: 1.43 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 22 (1.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.64 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 23 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.61 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.32 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 386 (18.1%), check_bayes: 377 (17.7%), b_tokenize: 9 (0.4%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.3%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 355 (16.7%), b_finish: 1.17 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 221 (10.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.65 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.7 (0.2%), poll_dns_idle: 1430 (67.2%), tests_pri_10: 4.4 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 1451 (68.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Ma, XinjianX" writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric W. Biederman >> ... >> Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com > Sorry, but <> around email address is needed > Reported-by: kernel test robot The change is already tested and pushed out so I really don't want to mess with it. Especially as I am aiming to send it to Linus on Wednesday after it has had a chance to pass through linux-next and whatever automated tests are there. What does copying and pasting the Reported-by: tag as included in your original report cause to break? At this point I suspect that the danger of fat fingering something far outweighs whatever benefits might be gained by surrounding the email address with <> marks. Eric