Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:12:48 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/98] 5.10.61-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YSZB0FB9YNd82bei@debian>
References: <20210824165908.709932-1-sashal@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210824165908.709932-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sasha,

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:57:30PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.61 release.
> There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu 26 Aug 2021 04:58:25 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/56
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/57


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip