Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp485427pxb; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyQkHUkGpSDgb4AcIm+6NLa5LGpDH8uIv7QvBZtYcJbP97sM90kxluWBCqyvz5s0FaToLh X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d6d1:: with SMTP id x17mr23036201edr.64.1629902940265; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629902940; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j7QOnuD2XMQBOmroKQrpoagaw2beL/y5ngV4Ik2s/0CGB3UEmGew5Zlf79unKve/Lc gOOYcJvKqXQ9kZiuYWKUSEa+QV20eFaj0SmZnixIQckCHvtSYZv4txipZvG+Z/tMhEqK Krxyu4NzPKUM4xfeFQ8t9OZfJtUll4UQJRI3gM8exO0ozmBhrwBpo4kgCWNxf6h5UKLZ MkzOpYmWKXpqf68ntg4QX7jM18m3BIHWkVzZuZXF8oALLqUClAXOb0P51KFjeSnD+GdE XNAHiJeiZsD7NT1fSz/20vrGH2hem7giIrPV0dbmEw7M84QT4++sxv7/40aNuahc0DMT nNJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=k7kAFTtN5GyCnNiW5FdL7RXkuMBaRh4yIij8fQrjUPE=; b=zwNPxkYJl9ju31PbsU/oBFHsW4vGctI5yFJiPdSKUPfco/wVYn/Ig6We3zLmpdzR8n PiD8Fo7KwKZOxIaozoFKk9Llm6OTC+BIXnvNXjSUl3GdQjNfxE+xWY6hEXp/lqD+UXv1 CuWOUyHF/skK+epFYYsUUTsDzE09iWIuWyxkugZf0AotrTU2T6SLqL1RcENFvq8TqsUm brfsiHFtdaQFU2QHo6WwKQljOWQe9adCRp3+Z9+qGr/14cBtr9QORf3d+TzZO2hcjOvi lmmg1JrMilBQO/0UZDj2ReDk1oT45m8RfqEN/eDgijXAYknmiW4v0cRiwUfvGZfaIFHc xV0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="Jn/jUwEb"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u8si194789edx.410.2021.08.25.07.48.21; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="Jn/jUwEb"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240609AbhHYMMR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:12:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39717 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232681AbhHYMMQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:12:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629893490; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k7kAFTtN5GyCnNiW5FdL7RXkuMBaRh4yIij8fQrjUPE=; b=Jn/jUwEbL1MLUhqENchwujGHu/saYtOnsUhO0qeRffHHG/zbN9jRf/kp802D0xs/giJsdQ wYIIdVGJBqjR8DJMcYEwImvNtXndHVTiDjZPY+sInSdhZtEtl1sJrUXicfDFRB1fG6FyF4 t5HM6/bUVePlND/LSJ9AvK+PTLgebUw= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-152-_qIRcz-oO9ax3NjAUWw97Q-1; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:11:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _qIRcz-oO9ax3NjAUWw97Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id m33-20020a05600c3b2100b002e87a0542efso1169580wms.2 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k7kAFTtN5GyCnNiW5FdL7RXkuMBaRh4yIij8fQrjUPE=; b=UjSR2KP55AQ90LAHw7X1YdcivM2efV1gR0mhtiSFgi5VsqPQsGajr4yzPfhpNnUnVM uPfmllz2ulqKNJJ2wraJpdKu1I+DTsk6FOrWzjcAuJMYYwuuurglh03LbqOeHbeNmstt LNI2l77lw+IPz69DWDrRHyiVtQTeYQ3O91YuZpNvuNtsfIBtEwFQH6Yd63D3Ez9zRp6Q 1JblhhBS5ej75izKePn9P3sV67hcu9JzRBKTKuUs3uoWhTWMRgR56LhYGkmy7kXNzmVf FykMEK97blRZRAX4tO9bNawfpSfCeNQA0267PmplaynfgYnFO6XYS8Idm1Unb8sUGQE7 i6lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FWXXJIwUxalKTgKGH1B8Q9ERSWR/bAhdg47k/e+Kob87wEAYw ZbgUB5R0JntWHDRyywyRgQ6Vf6DMCkDJigp0zfuLKoWKqdZ7PUPdIoYIyQFFiULw7WtfSnhzj2+ TuWtIREHLPvwRty34DvGnJIIi X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1241:: with SMTP id j1mr25794376wrx.338.1629893485392; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:11:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1241:: with SMTP id j1mr25794344wrx.338.1629893485099; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p4ff23d6b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.242.61.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm6329219wrx.30.2021.08.25.05.11.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/page_alloc: always initialize memory map for the holes To: Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Simek , Mike Rapoport , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20210714123739.16493-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210714123739.16493-2-rppt@kernel.org> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <175e0e1e-90cd-5c69-69a3-9f44462679e3@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:11:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210714123739.16493-2-rppt@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.07.21 14:37, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > Currently memory map for the holes is initialized only when SPARSEMEM > memory model is used. Yet, even with FLATMEM there could be holes in the > physical memory layout that have memory map entries. > > For instance, the memory reserved using e820 API on i386 or > "reserved-memory" nodes in device tree would not appear in memblock.memory > and hence the struct pages for such holes will be skipped during memory map > initialization. > > These struct pages will be zeroed because the memory map for FLATMEM > systems is allocated with memblock_alloc_node() that clears the allocated > memory. While zeroed struct pages do not cause immediate problems, the > correct behaviour is to initialize every page using __init_single_page(). > Besides, enabling page poison for FLATMEM case will trigger > PF_POISONED_CHECK() unless the memory map is properly initialized. > > Make sure init_unavailable_range() is called for both SPARSEMEM and FLATMEM > so that struct pages representing memory holes would appear as PG_Reserved > with any memory layout. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 8 -------- > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 3b97e17806be..878d7af4403d 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -6624,7 +6624,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) > } > } > > -#if !defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM) > /* > * Only struct pages that correspond to ranges defined by memblock.memory > * are zeroed and initialized by going through __init_single_page() during > @@ -6669,13 +6668,6 @@ static void __init init_unavailable_range(unsigned long spfn, > pr_info("On node %d, zone %s: %lld pages in unavailable ranges", > node, zone_names[zone], pgcnt); > } > -#else > -static inline void init_unavailable_range(unsigned long spfn, > - unsigned long epfn, > - int zone, int node) > -{ > -} > -#endif > > static void __init memmap_init_zone_range(struct zone *zone, > unsigned long start_pfn, > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb