Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp89434pxb; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbogfmKbANpNGlOjbv+TW+noS1OfiwvFCgaa36DfS+FekDCtozQ321SJks1ZzurG7J5Wco X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d915:: with SMTP id r21mr1480629ioc.76.1629950583575; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629950583; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eIomgfbDzZt5alc0+Mt/9EdX8Ae9lY4kqsO4zHqFOb1OdDxE4qi/ErKneyVori4jvv Mj1+Qff2u4KZ50tww2GTDymnss42o6ERVJQZZS+3eiCPhfCf8UC1erzetQtBXsE6CceX UJyvqPofZxL2hG0h2PFX1CR8kzAbspdbnblcvfxqEEtCYNPpITz9/NIqKdfT4nb3DyUp O+/8WvB9815sLdavn+vEuG6LMYNw8tIIBMFp++rmYTnd9WjYEXwB0p4fI5JxunFr8c6t gspfj7v9gEF98yEmXVM/1j7mzyBJfKuL3X7vSG7DXxc6xQEB636j6RP3wug2H5hgYePa xdvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=3HM/bXG5zSwq9GUwco4MejfEHbVjMmT87jzrLt6TPLQ=; b=TTkfLPk/SDPo1h5zQlqR3pPRjOQrbuIYUtvzFAKjoD9CiEFnM5z65dbCBkqM/THuZC dQ4FfbhXeGeVyGCxl9njV1rQa7EnOZi4A2mBzqLWYPN0ewNFwn8wZXUxvnFD9J/0Gypo epwqnf+OY78DPdnE8s/NpWT5LkkIrg/Ehwr8sQqnZkpXMknEy1R3yU4Ef+FWlJCcRdL7 QX6Y30nc3KHADpRsjJ0o/HWsT/8XeYm3nKEenl5DerVjth6Hb/rDJ5JR07nV7MveOWmF nyUYa6qYLyKKFheXK7OBrUSeYy7e4bA6EIjQ6ALx2Gvb5Qc1tlwp0hngsl1B9iepnHpE trlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QsRNc6Mu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b16si1724530ilf.112.2021.08.25.21.02.44; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QsRNc6Mu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229608AbhHZECr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:02:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229463AbhHZECr (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:02:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7381CC061757 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id b6so2697737wrh.10 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3HM/bXG5zSwq9GUwco4MejfEHbVjMmT87jzrLt6TPLQ=; b=QsRNc6MuUobVxBq9hrJ4hN/oUm02ypYpGftX33ffll7Gpa15Hpbh+1/cKuZ/DibU2c IW9De6iNWwxeeI0V6U7vMuQ10e7Uy2aKW2p+h94sSWHcpHGNrCqceNXW48AncmkdnBh7 Jco37SvmqoDjwukXkktHML3wXwh4+zRCY2FzIYQhE87pirW5rzaFq1aipdL8wL/cIRCF oLKlEgFezJfyUFbo/ZM63U540Nb67JTL2ORLHSmZKtAWgQOPyOvLV31ix5Q8sQ6cum2f Zx5h9EYh0f5ZASyKUq/KTVpzMTWnq0mJKwd6n8T4yBZJgvRlEdYDDWdZl3DspC8d+TVV 5cZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3HM/bXG5zSwq9GUwco4MejfEHbVjMmT87jzrLt6TPLQ=; b=ayrr13zn4rvyvvP67SvKfgiqcfI5QhyhT/qg6xquKZK5OKrtpdJl66bVo/4SgW+L41 tEAFG/uLNWbohijqA/uuYtSKsDSOXIF7f2GourCmqiQeIld4oiksgJCZjneP9/PQPgbY WwjHuaebtGQHzDr3TOnecKclVXaogIdW9/EkHk3aI42PLmwwRtPVggQzhMOjvhiiqGan M+Q8ePWJ2kMaMDw5ZpNH1HeSBy0U9Ao7PYDXsX0z2RteLHtgY2qLfWJdX3wQ6PfH/J7X Z/Fhm7+4tcQ93ft2ezao/FGxXMdrjg0djO1P8Vr9UX7uJGCOz6YKcFM9fHCk7hOmInPt YuYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NrJmilae5xxoKLcWBABKlR+Uc75ULT5V8e4aSFB9s24t7JCRH 8e4EYL2rIOmR2YJsNlHsQOSQBeutdUyhyYSjjRGj3Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8006:: with SMTP id 6mr1394954wrk.38.1629950517907; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:01:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210826012626.1163705-1-isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> <20210826012626.1163705-2-isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> In-Reply-To: <20210826012626.1163705-2-isabellabdoamaral@usp.br> From: David Gow Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:01:46 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] hash.h: remove unused define directive To: Isabella Basso Cc: linux@sciencehorizons.net, Geert Uytterhoeven , ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com, augusto.duraes33@gmail.com, Brendan Higgins , Daniel Latypov , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , KUnit Development , ~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:26 AM Isabella Basso w= rote: > > The HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 (single underscore) define hasn't been used for > any known supported architectures that have their own hash function > implementation (i.e. m68k, Microblaze, H8/300, pa-risc) since George's > patch [1], which introduced it. > > The supported 32-bit architectures from the list above have only been > making use of the (more general) HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 define, which only > lacks the right shift operator, that wasn't targeted for optimizations > so far. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160525073311.5600.qmail@ns.sciencehori= zons.net/ > > Co-developed-by: Augusto Dur=C3=A3es Camargo > Signed-off-by: Augusto Dur=C3=A3es Camargo > Co-developed-by: Enzo Ferreira > Signed-off-by: Enzo Ferreira > Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso > --- I'm not familiar with the hash functions here, so take this with the appropriate heap of salt, but it took me a little while to understand exactly what this is doing. As I understand it: - There are separate __hash_32() and hash_32() functions. - Both of these have generic implementations, which can optionally be overridden by an architecture-specific optimised version. - There aren't any architectures which provide an optimised hash_32() implementation. - This patch therefore removes support for architecture-specific hash_32() implementations, and leaves only the generic implementation. - This generic implementation of hash_32() itself relies on __hash_32(), which may still be optimised. Could the commit description be updated to make this a bit clearer? While we are getting rid of the HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 #define, that seems to be a side-effect/implementation detail of removing support for architecture-specific hash_32() implementations... The other wild, out-there option would be to remove __hash_32() entirely and make everything use hash_32(), which then could have architecture-specific implementations. A quick grep reveals that there's only one use of __hash_32() outside of the hashing code itself (in fs/namei.c). This would be much more consistent with what hash_64() does, but also would be significantly more work, and potentially could have some implication (full_name_hash() performance maybe?) which I'm not aware of. So it's possibly not worth it. Cheers, -- David > include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > lib/test_hash.c | 24 +----------------------- > tools/include/linux/hash.h | 5 +---- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hash.h > +++ b/include/linux/hash.h > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > } > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > -#endif > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > { > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c > index 0ee40b4a56dd..d4b0cfdb0377 100644 > --- a/lib/test_hash.c > +++ b/lib/test_hash.c > @@ -94,22 +94,7 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][3= 3]) > pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) =3D %#x > %#x", h0, k, h= 1, m); > return false; > } > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > - h2 =3D hash_32_generic(h0, k); > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 =3D=3D 1 > - if (h1 !=3D h2) { > - pr_err("hash_32(%#x, %d) =3D %#x !=3D hash_32_gen= eric() " > - " =3D %#x", h0, k, h1, h2); > - return false; > - } > -#else > - if (h2 > m) { > - pr_err("hash_32_generic(%#x, %d) =3D %#x > %#x", > - h0, k, h1, m); > - return false; > - } > -#endif > -#endif > + > /* Test hash_64 */ > hash_or[1][k] |=3D h1 =3D hash_64(h64, k); > if (h1 > m) { > @@ -227,13 +212,6 @@ test_hash_init(void) > #else > pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > #endif > -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 !=3D 1 > - pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > -#endif > -#else > - pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); > -#endif > #ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 > #if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 !=3D 1 > pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); > diff --git a/tools/include/linux/hash.h b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > index ad6fa21d977b..38edaa08f862 100644 > --- a/tools/include/linux/hash.h > +++ b/tools/include/linux/hash.h > @@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ static inline u32 __hash_32_generic(u32 val) > return val * GOLDEN_RATIO_32; > } > > -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 > -#define hash_32 hash_32_generic > -#endif > -static inline u32 hash_32_generic(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > +static inline u32 hash_32(u32 val, unsigned int bits) > { > /* High bits are more random, so use them. */ > return __hash_32(val) >> (32 - bits); > -- > 2.33.0 >