Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:37:51 +0200
Message-ID: <s5h35qwwfds.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: renesas-xhci: Prefer firmware loading on unknown ROM state
In-Reply-To: <YSeHWusVwn9XMHMg@kroah.com>
References: <20210819113427.1166-1-tiwai@suse.de>
        <YSd/9clcNN547vre@kroah.com>
        <s5h8s0owhbp.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <YSeHWusVwn9XMHMg@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3
 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:21:46 +0200,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 01:55:54PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:50:13 +0200,
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 01:34:27PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > The recent attempt to handle an unknown ROM state in the commit
> > > > d143825baf15 ("usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM state")
> > > > resulted in a regression and reverted later by the commit 44cf53602f5a
> > > > ("Revert "usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM state"").
> > > > The problem of the former fix was that it treated the failure of
> > > > firmware loading as a fatal error.  Since the firmware files aren't
> > > > included in the standard linux-firmware tree, most users don't have
> > > > them, hence they got the non-working system after that.  The revert
> > > > fixed the regression, but also it didn't make the firmware loading
> > > > triggered even on the devices that do need it.  So we need still a fix
> > > > for them.
> > > > 
> > > > This is another attempt to handle the unknown ROM state.  Like the
> > > > previous fix, this also tries to load the firmware when ROM shows
> > > > unknown state.  In this patch, however, the failure of a firmware
> > > > loading (such as a missing firmware file) isn't handled as a fatal
> > > > error any longer when ROM has been already detected, but it falls back
> > > > to the ROM mode like before.  The error is returned only when no ROM
> > > > is detected and the firmware loading failed.
> > > > 
> > > > Along with it, for simplifying the code flow, the detection and the
> > > > check of ROM is factored out from renesas_fw_check_running() and done
> > > > in the caller side, renesas_xhci_check_request_fw().  It avoids the
> > > > redundant ROM checks.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch was tested on Lenovo Thinkpad T14 gen (BIOS 1.34).  Also it
> > > > was confirmed that no regression is seen on another Thinkpad T14
> > > > machine that has worked without the patch, too.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 44cf53602f5a ("Revert "usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM state"")
> > > > BugLink: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189207
> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > This does not apply to my usb-linus branch, are you sure it is still
> > > needed in Linus's tree right now?
> > 
> > I guess we can postpone for 5.15.  The patch was written for the code
> > on linux-next, and I see there have been a few code clean up there.
> > 
> > But the patch itself could be applied to Linus tree with a slight
> > fuzz, so the stable backport should be fine.
> > 
> > If it's still not cleanly applicable, let me know.  I'll refresh the
> > patch for whatever preferred branch.
> 
> It was not cleanly applicable, 'git am' did not like it against my
> usb-linus branch (which is 5.14-rc7 + a few other USB patches not in
> this driver).
> 
> So if you want to rebase it against that, I will be glad to take it for
> 5.14-final to resolve this issue.

OK, then let me resubmit.  Wait for a minute...


thanks,

Takashi