Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp680741pxb; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwee0XMT8P9pq/IqoCo1uRgNRF55DaXPAL/nbG9g9f0Nr+1lhbhjJIE+I53yEq1OMOBZQ3I X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:430a:: with SMTP id m10mr5901713edc.235.1630004177076; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630004177; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jQrQRVU4oUY0zQ8s0TGM8PmU42a3K+5ZhtSj9rLxDJ9C+b6aO4NXWDlT4tDGSibKBd n2Oo5h1kzQ8L+4O/uUfeGdpZWT2XJBxniTFVwMnrM/B5/0s7pB47nzubG1e/OCsoPI91 ug0XZWR4e3EyOhs1/4GJSeFYt9gLIJ+iDdNYSlEmdJQyr5IXudXRzp3EFdJLvVem0K7T o3EJrXJZp97GCA6G/dxThL9/rt/Q7Cm8htqBVzPVX9IvbO5f5kx3Ob1kEyQU8X6vZuNd PfHaQ3F1wYW0lALi7nJvcrzMyd4RgK0kQzWXjxMcxO7xd8J9QMvuNMWXpYFByf6+csnN 62Fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=vpVLLHtyiBgM3OSfEqWjpsbhXJ4fDzpr6hf1ZLNtgVc=; b=iZx2beRX48dTwnV74lZ0WfbovTq6xBB4zkkw9tSWL3Xzr4wpRTxnaWv/jo05ufg2hX ivTbCyZuXKXZM7ihiA9NOlxq1ecbho4acykjd8+c9yttdZLVioQxLqUBqx0bBq0ZFlbV pcFgrKHaHcsfClf4IlYuFMSahHyvohrxPUUv+gaW4bA2OBQFUvR6nnTJNKC8dHs0PfSJ vQvxpdRn6syWblrpR0mT06qrBbqcK/m0NbLoCeJqkF7nvmGWt3cHyyQq/dos+MMzc8uj ly9roIgk7GGX/eMuxBuE9e0knUKoDfOXInuNg0SWuNXeQEYF6N1zhIixqw6epDUtX98u hIRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=iRxoH25F; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si3874414ejm.5.2021.08.26.11.55.50; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=iRxoH25F; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243375AbhHZSzJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:55:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35976 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243300AbhHZSzI (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:55:08 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F0756103A; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1630004061; bh=awLNwXH+S/inqd/CMY5NTZlgpCSMS3Jv7uZhGbj/w9g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iRxoH25Fg40Bl4Ny4D0JEobBQAtJyDpKn1tMc2LdkoFPOzLY9zuK7oiOLjNXfTWH6 JwWb77BiZhvzWLmrWQvwnD13xL/8fi5N9SXvajKjl3KPIIwhxNaSDJiprQemRNV73d 0upR3I7qmFFbPt6JXvU+TCChTqafUoAAlY2gjlclzgtbqf62JfjG/4SlgWoFkvIUzU 2Umu2t2rhlqYTglYRKvmpx/Iq/yuaKFoQYSi7wNDXkScwpChdppr4OPJ67Qu54JKgk X/G35E3QspQnsfDHDp7X7zObHK0PO6CENBxeud29P7hsDNruB5xyrVxNNTn8Gtvn4k fHj1ypPXNRWSw== Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:54:17 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto Message-ID: References: <389962b1b702e3c78d169e59bcfac56282889173.1618331882.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <87h7fcc2m4.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7fcc2m4.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Nathan Chancellor writes: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:38:10PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> Using asm goto in __WARN_FLAGS() and WARN_ON() allows more > >> flexibility to GCC. > ... > > > > This patch as commit 1e688dd2a3d6 ("powerpc/bug: Provide better > > flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto") cause a WARN_ON in > > klist_add_tail to trigger over and over on boot when compiling with > > clang: > > > > [ 2.177416][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/klist.c:62 .klist_add_tail+0x3c/0x110 > > [ 2.177456][ T1] Modules linked in: > > [ 2.177481][ T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 5.14.0-rc7-next-20210825 #1 > > [ 2.177520][ T1] NIP: c0000000007ff81c LR: c00000000090a038 CTR: 0000000000000000 > > [ 2.177557][ T1] REGS: c0000000073c32a0 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G W (5.14.0-rc7-next-20210825) > > [ 2.177593][ T1] MSR: 8000000002029032 CR: 22000a40 XER: 00000000 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] CFAR: c00000000090a034 IRQMASK: 0 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR00: c00000000090a038 c0000000073c3540 c000000001be3200 0000000000000001 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR04: c0000000072d65c0 0000000000000000 c0000000091ba798 c0000000091bb0a0 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR08: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 c000000008581918 fffffffffffffc00 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR12: 0000000044000240 c000000001dd0000 c000000000012300 0000000000000000 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000000017e3200 0000000000000000 c000000001a0e778 > > [ 2.177667][ T1] GPR28: c0000000072d65b0 c0000000072d65a8 c000000007de72c8 c0000000073c35d0 > > [ 2.178019][ T1] NIP [c0000000007ff81c] .klist_add_tail+0x3c/0x110 > > [ 2.178058][ T1] LR [c00000000090a038] .bus_add_driver+0x148/0x290 > > [ 2.178088][ T1] Call Trace: > > [ 2.178105][ T1] [c0000000073c3540] [c0000000073c35d0] 0xc0000000073c35d0 (unreliable) > > [ 2.178150][ T1] [c0000000073c35d0] [c00000000090a038] .bus_add_driver+0x148/0x290 > > [ 2.178190][ T1] [c0000000073c3670] [c00000000090fae8] .driver_register+0xb8/0x190 > > [ 2.178234][ T1] [c0000000073c3700] [c000000000be55c0] .__hid_register_driver+0x70/0xd0 > > [ 2.178275][ T1] [c0000000073c37a0] [c00000000116955c] .redragon_driver_init+0x34/0x58 > > [ 2.178314][ T1] [c0000000073c3820] [c000000000011ae0] .do_one_initcall+0x130/0x3b0 > > [ 2.178357][ T1] [c0000000073c3bb0] [c0000000011065e0] .do_initcall_level+0xd8/0x188 > > [ 2.178403][ T1] [c0000000073c3c50] [c0000000011064a8] .do_initcalls+0x7c/0xdc > > [ 2.178445][ T1] [c0000000073c3ce0] [c000000001106238] .kernel_init_freeable+0x178/0x21c > > [ 2.178491][ T1] [c0000000073c3d90] [c000000000012334] .kernel_init+0x34/0x220 > > [ 2.178530][ T1] [c0000000073c3e10] [c00000000000cf50] .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0x60 > > [ 2.178569][ T1] Instruction dump: > > [ 2.178592][ T1] fba10078 7c7d1b78 38600001 fb810070 3b9d0008 fbc10080 7c9e2378 389d0018 > > [ 2.178662][ T1] fb9d0008 fb9d0010 90640000 fbdd0000 <0b1e0000> e87e0018 28230000 41820024 > > [ 2.178728][ T1] ---[ end trace 52ed3431f58f1847 ]--- > > > > Is this a bug with clang or is there something wrong with the patch? The > > vmlinux image is available at [1] if you want to inspect it and our QEMU > > command and the warning at boot can be viewed at [2]. If there is any > > other information I can provide, please let me know. > > > > [1] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1xDcmp3Tvno0TTGxDVPedRKIKM2/ > > [2] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/commit/cee159b66a58eb57fa2359e7888074b9da24126c/checks/3422232736/logs > > Thanks. > > This is the generated assembly: > > c0000000007ff600 <.klist_add_tail>: > c0000000007ff600: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0 > c0000000007ff604: f8 01 00 10 std r0,16(r1) > c0000000007ff608: f8 21 ff 71 stdu r1,-144(r1) ^ prolog > c0000000007ff60c: fb a1 00 78 std r29,120(r1) save r29 to stack > c0000000007ff610: 7c 7d 1b 78 mr r29,r3 r29 = struct klist_node *n > c0000000007ff614: 38 60 00 01 li r3,1 r3 = 1 > c0000000007ff618: fb 81 00 70 std r28,112(r1) save r28 to stack > c0000000007ff61c: 3b 9d 00 08 addi r28,r29,8 r28 = &n->n_node > c0000000007ff620: fb c1 00 80 std r30,128(r1) save r30 to stack > c0000000007ff624: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4 r30 = struct klist *k > c0000000007ff628: 38 9d 00 18 addi r4,r29,24 r4 = &n->n_ref > c0000000007ff62c: fb 9d 00 08 std r28,8(r29) n->n_node.next = &n->n_node INIT_LIST_HEAD > c0000000007ff630: fb 9d 00 10 std r28,16(r29) n->n_node.prev = &n->n_node > c0000000007ff634: 90 64 00 00 stw r3,0(r4) kref_init(&n->n_ref) > c0000000007ff638: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29) n->n_klist = k > c0000000007ff63c: 0b 1e 00 00 tdnei r30,0 trap if r30 (k) is not zero > > > From: > > static void knode_set_klist(struct klist_node *knode, struct klist *klist) > { > knode->n_klist = klist; > /* no knode deserves to start its life dead */ > WARN_ON(knode_dead(knode)); > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > } > > Which expands to: > > static void knode_set_klist(struct klist_node *knode, struct klist *klist) > { > knode->n_klist = klist; > > ({ > bool __ret_warn_on = false; > do { > ... > } else { > __label__ __label_warn_on; > do { > asm goto( > "1: " > "tdnei" > " > " " % 4, > 0 " "\n " ".section __ex_table,\"a\";" > " " > ".balign 4;" > " " > ".long (1b) - . ;" > " " > ".long (%l[__label_warn_on]) - . ;" > " " > ".previous" > " " > ".section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n" > "2:\t.4byte 1b - 2b, %0 - 2b\n" > "\t.short %1, %2\n" > ".org 2b+%3\n" > ".previous\n" > : > : "i"("lib/klist.c"), "i"(62), > "i"((1 << 0) | ((9) << 8)), > "i"(sizeof(struct bug_entry)), > "r"(knode_dead(knode)) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > : > : __label_warn_on); > asm(""); > } while (0); > break; > __label_warn_on: > __ret_warn_on = true; > } > } while (0); > __builtin_expect(!!(__ret_warn_on), 0); > }); > } > > And knode_dead is: > > #define KNODE_DEAD 1LU > > static bool knode_dead(struct klist_node *knode) > { > return (unsigned long)knode->n_klist & KNODE_DEAD; > } > > > So it's meant to warn if (n_klist & KNODE_DEAD) is not equal to zero. > > But in the asm: > > c0000000007ff600 <.klist_add_tail>: > ... > c0000000007ff624: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4 r30 = struct klist *k > ... > c0000000007ff638: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29) n->n_klist = k > c0000000007ff63c: 0b 1e 00 00 tdnei r30,0 trap if r30 (k) is not zero > > > It's just warning if n_klist is not equal to zero. ie. we lost the "& KNODE_DEAD". > > In the GCC output you can see it: > > c0000000008c8a30 <.klist_node_init>: > c0000000008c8a30: 39 24 00 08 addi r9,r4,8 > c0000000008c8a34: 39 40 00 01 li r10,1 > c0000000008c8a38: f9 24 00 08 std r9,8(r4) > c0000000008c8a3c: f9 24 00 10 std r9,16(r4) > c0000000008c8a40: 91 44 00 18 stw r10,24(r4) > c0000000008c8a44: f8 64 00 00 std r3,0(r4) > c0000000008c8a48: 54 69 07 fe clrlwi r9,r3,31 > c0000000008c8a4c: 0b 09 00 00 tdnei r9,0 > > ie. the clrlwi is "clear left (word) immediate", and zeroes everything > except bit 0, which is equivalent to "& KNODE_DEAD". > > > So there seems to be some misunderstanding with clang, it doesn't like > us passing an expression to the inline asm. > > AFAIK it is legal to pass expressions as inputs to inline asm, ie. it > doesn't have to just be a variable name. > > This patch seems to fix it. Not sure if that's just papering over it though. > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h > index 1ee0f22313ee..75fcb4370d96 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ __label_warn_on: \ > \ > WARN_ENTRY(PPC_TLNEI " %4, 0", \ > BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_TAINT(TAINT_WARN), \ > - __label_warn_on, "r" (x)); \ > + __label_warn_on, "r" (!!(x))); \ > break; \ > __label_warn_on: \ > __ret_warn_on = true; \ > > > Generates: > > c0000000008e2ac0 <.klist_add_tail>: > c0000000008e2ac0: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0 > c0000000008e2ac4: f8 01 00 10 std r0,16(r1) > c0000000008e2ac8: f8 21 ff 71 stdu r1,-144(r1) > c0000000008e2acc: fb a1 00 78 std r29,120(r1) > c0000000008e2ad0: 7c 7d 1b 78 mr r29,r3 > c0000000008e2ad4: 38 60 00 01 li r3,1 > c0000000008e2ad8: fb c1 00 80 std r30,128(r1) > c0000000008e2adc: 7c 9e 23 78 mr r30,r4 > c0000000008e2ae0: 38 9d 00 18 addi r4,r29,24 > c0000000008e2ae4: 57 c5 07 fe clrlwi r5,r30,31 <- > c0000000008e2ae8: fb 81 00 70 std r28,112(r1) > c0000000008e2aec: 3b 9d 00 08 addi r28,r29,8 > c0000000008e2af0: fb 9d 00 08 std r28,8(r29) > c0000000008e2af4: fb 9d 00 10 std r28,16(r29) > c0000000008e2af8: 90 64 00 00 stw r3,0(r4) > c0000000008e2afc: fb dd 00 00 std r30,0(r29) > c0000000008e2b00: 0b 05 00 00 tdnei r5,0 <- Thank you for the in-depth explanation and triage! I have gone ahead and created a standalone reproducer that shows this based on the preprocessed file and opened https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51634 so the LLVM developers can take a look. Cheers, Nathan