Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:53:51 +0800
From:   Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tao.zhou@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix get_push_task() vs migrate_disable()
Message-ID: <YSgbfyLdkEApqsoI@geo.homenetwork>
References: <20210826133738.yiotqbtdaxzjsnfj@linutronix.de>
 <YSfAWkWvd+4MJcvu@geo.homenetwork>
 <87k0k82dzq.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k0k82dzq.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Tao,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 27 2021 at 00:24, Tao Zhou wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >> index e205b63d6db07..32a4945730a9b 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> >> @@ -2259,6 +2259,9 @@ static inline struct task_struct *get_push_task(struct rq *rq)
> >>  	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> >>  		return NULL;
> >>  
> >> +	if (p->migration_disabled)
> >> +		return NULL;
> >
> > Not much I can restore here..
> >
> > Is is_migration_disabled(p) be more correct to check migration
> > disable.
> 
> Kinda, but it's not an issue here because get_push_task() is only available when
> CONFIG_SMP=y which makes p->migration_disabled available as well.
> 
> > And get_push_task() being called in pull_rt_task() has checked migration
> > disable first and then call get_push_task(). That means this check in
> > get_push_task() in patch is a second repeatly check.
> 
> No. The checks are for two different tasks...

Aha, yes. I lost here. Thanks for your reply.

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx


Thanks,
Tao