Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp1197438pxb; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 03:39:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsUiI9XPX/IjuEhIX4xFEnJyJpeVfkkMC6C1wo4jGFkHu0lZO+eAgZVBHGMndS15/nHXRZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2cd5:: with SMTP id r21mr9075829ejr.435.1630060772249; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 03:39:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630060772; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wjjN+MlE4lBSuLN19dqs4qq4KzMnhnGmewnKHGIlze7XyDI+QQGk0gs+lbnfKejFWm QHo4N+KH+1xom+Ii0EIdI9U31NUPHjW7SSGjCa+3N8Iv9pwSNFg0JYP+QHk4f+Pl3m/N k4SQK3bVCFVcWvNApQE3HccOy/2h46swqycrz1aNGZnHgiC8XwNwkqUAd3vWHBp0qbZH ZHPVIwFxpxf+yMQa6+2c9BqNCWAfnjmI7YAwdTlmDODvQE8hz7iXHY3mitBHhgLnwwYm kqYPyjzTY66vBrosRyjRjkLWqsPkVtJy+cLS0U8KVjdQP1ouPnDbdqv/o8RKV1uX4A18 Jk9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=0pGeGD9Z8ST9drDe4KBcbweYKoeUqRqSKhAoJD/ez8M=; b=NdbTe3foYzOqCu86cijdjVyaK5qINB/3t0cA8D3bbnILOt4zoC+Q9CJGciYcPMJZ+E k1NcgJ4voXsFWjGe7Q56nDCL5db3SQ1KVENHu5rdB2UW3mXPASh/emNaX0MqEJNViY46 qFJoZ9YJyyHJ7h5IqSZ0+3uLB/A0eMHXrZj0H6vcdWcw+gP7eftWTJRxmbR0GN/yYCKZ jA0v361dwiszyzz5MRioQCz/8dlJACiGCYAPFYF0QP1V+2lhBtKTBqtHjGEezodnZeWD YbTLqm6yqzywMtWaJr6TTdglg2unC3nIlfIbjMQD6M0HBTn+lQh3vVXr3fdDcW9kIzor 5bkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z5si5528784eja.692.2021.08.27.03.39.09; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 03:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244973AbhH0Khw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:37:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244706AbhH0Khv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:37:51 -0400 Received: from ha0.nfschina.com (unknown [IPv6:2400:dd01:100f:2:d63d:7eff:fe08:eb3f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C77C061757; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 03:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ha0.nfschina.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDDAAE0DE1; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:36:02 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at test.com Received: from ha0.nfschina.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ha0.nfschina.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrSRWxGQWKsl; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:35:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [180.167.10.98]) (Authenticated sender: liqiong@nfschina.com) by ha0.nfschina.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8060AE0DB0; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:35:37 +0800 (CST) From: liqiong To: Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr, zohar@linux.ibm.com Cc: dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liqiong@nfschina.com Subject: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock when traversing "ima_default_rules". Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:35:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20210827103536.4149-1-liqiong@nfschina.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20210824085747.23604-1-liqiong@nfschina.com> References: <20210824085747.23604-1-liqiong@nfschina.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules" that default to "&ima_default_rules". When loading a custom policy for the first time, the variable is updated to "&ima_policy_rules" instead. That update isn't RCU-safe, and deadlocks are possible. Indeed, some functions like ima_match_policy() may loop indefinitely when traversing "ima_default_rules" with list_for_each_entry_rcu(). When iterating over the default ruleset back to head, if the list head is "ima_default_rules", and "ima_rules" have been updated to "&ima_policy_rules", the loop condition (&entry->list != ima_rules) stays always true, traversing won't terminate, causing a soft lockup and RCU stalls. Introduce a temporary value for "ima_rules" when iterating over the ruleset to avoid the deadlocks. Signed-off-by: liqiong Reviewed-by: THOBY Simon --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index fd5d46e511f1..e92b197bfd3c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -662,12 +662,14 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, { struct ima_rule_entry *entry; int action = 0, actmask = flags | (flags << 1); + struct list_head *ima_rules_tmp; if (template_desc && !*template_desc) *template_desc = ima_template_desc_current(); rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules, list) { + ima_rules_tmp = rcu_dereference(ima_rules); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules_tmp, list) { if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; @@ -919,8 +921,8 @@ void ima_update_policy(void) if (ima_rules != policy) { ima_policy_flag = 0; - ima_rules = policy; + rcu_assign_pointer(ima_rules, policy); /* * IMA architecture specific policy rules are specified * as strings and converted to an array of ima_entry_rules @@ -1649,9 +1651,11 @@ void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { loff_t l = *pos; struct ima_rule_entry *entry; + struct list_head *ima_rules_tmp; rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules, list) { + ima_rules_tmp = rcu_dereference(ima_rules); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules_tmp, list) { if (!l--) { rcu_read_unlock(); return entry; @@ -1670,7 +1674,8 @@ void *ima_policy_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) rcu_read_unlock(); (*pos)++; - return (&entry->list == ima_rules) ? NULL : entry; + return (&entry->list == &ima_default_rules || + &entry->list == &ima_policy_rules) ? NULL : entry; } void ima_policy_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v) @@ -1872,6 +1877,7 @@ bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id id) struct ima_rule_entry *entry; bool found = false; enum ima_hooks func; + struct list_head *ima_rules_tmp; if (id >= READING_MAX_ID) return false; @@ -1879,7 +1885,8 @@ bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id id) func = read_idmap[id] ?: FILE_CHECK; rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules, list) { + ima_rules_tmp = rcu_dereference(ima_rules); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules_tmp, list) { if (entry->action != APPRAISE) continue; -- 2.11.0