Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760579AbWLFNJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:09:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760582AbWLFNJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:09:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46377 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760585AbWLFNJi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:09:38 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1165409880.15706.9.camel@localhost> References: <1165409880.15706.9.camel@localhost> <200612052134_MC3-1-D40B-A5DB@compuserve.com> To: Kasper Sandberg Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, David Howells , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , ak@muc.de, vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:08:41 +0000 Message-ID: <24125.1165410521@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 647 Lines: 15 Kasper Sandberg wrote: > and i am very very sure its because of this, i can run with the kernel > (atleast with rc5 i had that long) for 10 days, and then chroot in, run > the 32bit apps, and within hours of using, hardlock. What do you mean by "hardlock"? Do you mean the application has to be killed, or do you mean the kernel is stuck and the machine has to be rebooted? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/