Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936940AbWLFRoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:44:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936943AbWLFRoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:44:23 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:36858 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936940AbWLFRoW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:44:22 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: john stultz Subject: Re: PMTMR running too fast Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:44:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1165153834.5499.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1165259962.6152.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1165259962.6152.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612061744.47249.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1482 Lines: 35 > > > Is there a specific reason the check was removed (I couldn't see on in > > the archives) or was it simply overlooked? Without it I need to pass > > clocksource=tsc to have 2.6.18 work correctly on an older K6 system with > > an Aladdin chipset (will dig out the precise details if required). Would > > a patch to reintroduce the check be acceptable or would some sort of > > blacklist based solution be more acceptable? > > If I recall correctly, it was pulled because there was some question as > to if it was actually needed (x86_64 didn't need it) and it slows down > the boot time (although not by much). > > I'm fine just re-adding it. Although if the number of affected systems > are small we could just blacklist it (Ian, mind sending dmidecode > output?). > > Andi, your thoughts? Doing a check at boot time is fine for me. Just I don't want the "read pmtmr three times at runtime" code anywhere near x86-64 I don't think the boot time check needs DMI guarding But BTW the check is not necessarily enough -- there is at least one NF3 machine around where the PIT timer ticks at a wrong frequency. Safer would be probably to calibrate against RTC which is afaik used by Windows too (so it's likely to be ok) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/