Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210825102636.52757-4-21cnbao@gmail.com> <20210829145552.GA11556@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
 <CAGsJ_4yYwjuWsEeK3CvnOhc10mbBNYWXqxqp+mR5587R2FD3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4yYwjuWsEeK3CvnOhc10mbBNYWXqxqp+mR5587R2FD3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Aug 2021 13:36:19 +1200
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zwRdR2QuoR0K0_J86w0=t=mFh=tAKRuP1+Tx8aLn4kKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PCI/MSI] a4fc4cf388: dmesg.genirq:Flags_mismatch_irq##(mei_me)vs.#(xhci_hcd)
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc:     0day robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@lists.01.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bilbao@vt.edu,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        leon@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, luzmaximilian@gmail.com,
        mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 1:21 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
> >
> > commit: a4fc4cf388319ea957ffbdab5073bdd267de9082 ("[PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: remove msi_attrib.default_irq in msi_desc")
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Barry-Song/PCI-MSI-Clarify-the-IRQ-sysfs-ABI-for-PCI-devices/20210825-183018
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 6e764bcd1cf72a2846c0e53d3975a09b242c04c9
> >
> > in testcase: kernel-selftests
> > version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-ebaa603b-1_20210825
> > with following parameters:
> >
> >         group: pidfd
> >         ucode: 0xe2
> >
> > test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel.
> > test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt
> >
> >
> > on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz with 32G memory
> >
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> >
> >
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > [  179.602028][   T34] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 16. 00002000 (mei_me) vs. 00000000 (xhci_hcd)
> > [  179.614073][   T34] CPU: 2 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7-00014-ga4fc4cf38831 #1
> > [  179.623225][   T34] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7040/0Y7WYT, BIOS 1.8.1 12/05/2017
> > [  179.631432][   T34] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> > [  179.637543][   T34] Call Trace:
> > [  179.640789][   T34]  dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
> > [  179.645253][   T34]  __setup_irq.cold+0x50/0xd4
> > [  179.649893][   T34]  ? mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x480/0x480 [mei_me]
> > [  179.655923][   T34]  request_threaded_irq+0x10c/0x180
> > [  179.661073][   T34]  ? mei_me_irq_quick_handler+0x240/0x240 [mei_me]
> > [  179.667528][   T34]  mei_me_probe+0x131/0x300 [mei_me]
> > [  179.672767][   T34]  local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
> > [  179.677313][   T34]  pci_device_probe+0x107/0x1c0
> > [  179.682118][   T34]  really_probe+0xb6/0x380
> > [  179.687094][   T34]  __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
> > [  179.692242][   T34]  driver_probe_device+0x1e/0xc0
> > [  179.697133][   T34]  __driver_attach_async_helper+0x2b/0x80
> > [  179.702802][   T34]  async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0x140
> > [  179.707693][   T34]  process_one_work+0x274/0x5c0
> > [  179.712503][   T34]  worker_thread+0x50/0x3c0
> > [  179.716959][   T34]  ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
> > [  179.721936][   T34]  kthread+0x14f/0x180
> > [  179.725958][   T34]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
> > [  179.730935][   T34]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > [  179.735699][   T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: request_threaded_irq failure. irq = 16
> > [  179.743125][   T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed.
> > [  179.749399][   T34] mei_me: probe of 0000:00:16.0 failed with error -16
> >
> >
>
> it seems there is a direct reference to pdev->irq.
> Hi Oliver, would you try if the below patch can fix the problem:

+ Tomas

sorry. after second looking, drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c has many
places using pdev->irq directly. We really need this driver's
maintainers to address the problem.

On the other hand, "struct mei_me_hw *hw" seems to be totally not
used in this driver except here:
164 static int mei_me_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
pci_device_id *ent)
165 {
166         const struct mei_cfg *cfg;
167         struct mei_device *dev;
168         struct mei_me_hw *hw;
169         unsigned int irqflags;
170         int err;
.....
219         hw->irq = pdev->irq;
...

this looks wrong. maybe we can leverage hw->irq in other places such as
shutdown, suspend, resume.

Thanks
barry


>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c
> index c3393b383e59..a45a2d4257a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int mei_me_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>
>         pci_enable_msi(pdev);
>
> -       hw->irq = pdev->irq;
> +       hw->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
>
>          /* request and enable interrupt */
>         irqflags = pci_dev_msi_enabled(pdev) ? IRQF_ONESHOT : IRQF_SHARED;
>
>
> I don't have any hardware to test.
>
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> >         git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
> >         cd lkp-tests
> >         bin/lkp install                job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
> >         bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml  # generate the yaml file for lkp run
> >         bin/lkp run                    generated-yaml-file
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > 0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure                   Open Source Technology Center
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org       Intel Corporation
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Oliver Sang
> >
>
> Thanks
> barry