Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937757AbWLFWru (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:47:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937758AbWLFWru (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:47:50 -0500 Received: from nlpi015.sbcis.sbc.com ([207.115.36.44]:18790 "EHLO nlpi015.sbcis.sbc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937757AbWLFWrt (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:47:49 -0500 X-ORBL: [67.117.73.34] Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:45:12 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Jean Delvare Cc: Komal Shah , David Brownell , r-woodruff2@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: I2C driver for TI OMAP boards #3 Message-ID: <20061206224511.GC10391@atomide.com> References: <1154689868.12791.267626769@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060805103113.058ce8fe.khali@linux-fr.org> <20060807145832.GF10387@atomide.com> <20060810102944.a12329b9.khali@linux-fr.org> <20060810131925.GJ30195@atomide.com> <20061204184908.909bad9b.khali@linux-fr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061204184908.909bad9b.khali@linux-fr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2234 Lines: 59 Hi, * Jean Delvare [061204 09:49]: > Hi Tony, all, > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:19:26 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Jean Delvare [060810 11:30]: > > > I've now taken Komal's patch (#4). Here is a proposed patch which brings > > > the prescaler computation formula in line with your comment and table > > > above. It could be applied on top of Komal's patch unless it causes a > > > problem on some of the OMAP systems. For XOR = 13 MHz, it changes the > > > prescaler from 0 to 1. For XOR = 19.2 MHz it changes the prescaler from > > > 2 to 1. > > > > OK cool. As far as I'm concerned, I'm fine with it too: > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > > > > > I don't have any hardware to test it, though. If it happens to be > > > better to be slightly over 12 MHz than slightly below 7 MHz, the > > > "> 12000000" condition below can be replaced with "> 14000000". > > > > Thanks, we'll test it on various omaps and let you know if it works. > > Any news on this? I still have this patch in my local tree. Should I > push it into Linux 2.6.20? > > i2c: Fix OMAP clock prescaler to match the comment > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- linux-2.6.18-rc4.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c 2006-08-10 09:56:54.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c 2006-08-10 10:12:03.000000000 +0200 > @@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ > * 13 2 1 > * 19.2 2 1 > */ > - if (fclk_rate > 16000000) > - psc = (fclk_rate + 8000000) / 12000000; > + if (fclk_rate > 12000000) > + psc = fclk_rate / 12000000; > } > > /* Setup clock prescaler to obtain approx 12MHz I2C module clock: */ Sorry for the delay in replying. Yes, it's safe to push. When the original code was done, the max limit of 12MHz was ignored. Regards, Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/