Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp4288833pxb; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 01:10:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+5gudoKXFdXKLPdGcdNoWUSTCmg3CB2f+EVfxy6Ah9MwaTd/E3LpBzGEC8NQvG/XIm1Lq X-Received: by 2002:a5e:da44:: with SMTP id o4mr22330508iop.147.1630397450405; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 01:10:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630397450; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w3owTzfYHjgjKbdr681oyz8Ny6oO085t3W6VgpiQdd8Y45LpOKJHRNrVv+yDp9BfSl VHxb2WIeqNDCyPhTD4+5ztlJ/D/iK9kjb3wnfuyVil53686oLZVn08UJ0Y8dYvNTkVLy pBRmVEBgvC1boX42StCq4TuM8xeMNxbwy3inyAXhJigryUlKtAZkNE28TCq5jfGhsh8S mv5E+yfxgMSier9xBWkYFLFQIf14MX11qNl52Ge1Mm7lYmXQLsOVADk5Rs6Rq+l/r5YN XKy9pbCM6bz89G56S+Wj2EewwYAwHSy014cwyOWuxWYv/1fi46LFntib8fX/3IXPk0gI qynw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:mime-version; bh=xJElUCR6tP11TGncfOOmgsA9IL2E6jxuhWcs40nkTJw=; b=nu/6TXYzP9aJFYg9RI0f/P9jGM1bSo3ZOOefJTj5rlAURyoT7hqB/CfncEV2y1Pdz3 muP7uTs/42mPn+tM/TWSWIs0HdSGexVYfsrYZ5aNtIgv+7xbjzbyycYlw458wkg/mkef NqIQGXwkaLeMR/wb50Lc1F8YEhKkoq/bQSnfa6pS4iyt3O+QjBX/dW53MlQBZ5/ELQUT yTxkwXO2UbkbJIt1lU1PFz1Pil60uS3dhvoFFxPlMAQjLVuiZ+WTsbEfKqzcEFU6v4lE PW0ejFFGCP3X5/ESRXpIb9vE4btg0TbYCM+doQrsSVpZiD5AohtfX9zphQHfWra1n+Ez cc1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h8si17337323jav.8.2021.08.31.01.10.29; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 01:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240212AbhHaIJJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 04:09:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56912 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240107AbhHaIJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 04:09:03 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF5C0603E7; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKyoQ-008Adz-OJ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:08:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:08:06 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: kernel test robot , 0day robot , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , Barry Song , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bilbao@vt.edu, Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , leon@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linuxarm , luzmaximilian@gmail.com, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [PCI/MSI] a4fc4cf388: dmesg.genirq:Flags_mismatch_irq##(mei_me)vs.#(xhci_hcd) In-Reply-To: References: <20210825102636.52757-4-21cnbao@gmail.com> <20210829145552.GA11556@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: <1132a536516f15ab6b338ab868ec3705@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: 21cnbao@gmail.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, lkp@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bilbao@vt.edu, corbet@lwn.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, leon@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, luzmaximilian@gmail.com, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-08-31 02:21, Barry Song wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot > wrote: >> >> >> >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): >> >> commit: a4fc4cf388319ea957ffbdab5073bdd267de9082 ("[PATCH v3 3/3] >> PCI/MSI: remove msi_attrib.default_irq in msi_desc") >> url: >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Barry-Song/PCI-MSI-Clarify-the-IRQ-sysfs-ABI-for-PCI-devices/20210825-183018 >> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >> 6e764bcd1cf72a2846c0e53d3975a09b242c04c9 >> >> in testcase: kernel-selftests >> version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-ebaa603b-1_20210825 >> with following parameters: >> >> group: pidfd >> ucode: 0xe2 >> >> test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the >> tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small >> unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel. >> test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt >> >> >> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz >> with 32G memory >> >> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire >> log/backtrace): >> >> >> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag >> Reported-by: kernel test robot >> >> >> >> [ 179.602028][ T34] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 16. 00002000 >> (mei_me) vs. 00000000 (xhci_hcd) >> [ 179.614073][ T34] CPU: 2 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted >> 5.14.0-rc7-00014-ga4fc4cf38831 #1 >> [ 179.623225][ T34] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7040/0Y7WYT, >> BIOS 1.8.1 12/05/2017 >> [ 179.631432][ T34] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn >> [ 179.637543][ T34] Call Trace: >> [ 179.640789][ T34] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 >> [ 179.645253][ T34] __setup_irq.cold+0x50/0xd4 >> [ 179.649893][ T34] ? mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x480/0x480 [mei_me] >> [ 179.655923][ T34] request_threaded_irq+0x10c/0x180 >> [ 179.661073][ T34] ? mei_me_irq_quick_handler+0x240/0x240 >> [mei_me] >> [ 179.667528][ T34] mei_me_probe+0x131/0x300 [mei_me] >> [ 179.672767][ T34] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 >> [ 179.677313][ T34] pci_device_probe+0x107/0x1c0 >> [ 179.682118][ T34] really_probe+0xb6/0x380 >> [ 179.687094][ T34] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180 >> [ 179.692242][ T34] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0xc0 >> [ 179.697133][ T34] __driver_attach_async_helper+0x2b/0x80 >> [ 179.702802][ T34] async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0x140 >> [ 179.707693][ T34] process_one_work+0x274/0x5c0 >> [ 179.712503][ T34] worker_thread+0x50/0x3c0 >> [ 179.716959][ T34] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0 >> [ 179.721936][ T34] kthread+0x14f/0x180 >> [ 179.725958][ T34] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 >> [ 179.730935][ T34] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >> [ 179.735699][ T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: request_threaded_irq >> failure. irq = 16 >> [ 179.743125][ T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed. >> [ 179.749399][ T34] mei_me: probe of 0000:00:16.0 failed with error >> -16 >> >> > > it seems there is a direct reference to pdev->irq. > Hi Oliver, would you try if the below patch can fix the problem: > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > index c3393b383e59..a45a2d4257a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int mei_me_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > const struct pci_device_id *ent) > > pci_enable_msi(pdev); > > - hw->irq = pdev->irq; > + hw->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0); > > /* request and enable interrupt */ > irqflags = pci_dev_msi_enabled(pdev) ? IRQF_ONESHOT : > IRQF_SHARED; > Ah! one victim, 3000 to go! :D That's exactly the kind of stuff I was mentioning when we discussed this patch. Exposing the MSI vector as the INTx IRQ has led to all sorts of broken drivers. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...