Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031412AbWLGFyZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 00:54:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031422AbWLGFyZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 00:54:25 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:48713 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031412AbWLGFyY (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 00:54:24 -0500 To: Randy Dunlap cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin , Andrew Morton , Al Viro From: Michael Neuling Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add retain_initrd boot option In-reply-to: <4577A91E.70501@oracle.com> References: <20614.1165469597@neuling.org> <4577A91E.70501@oracle.com> Comments: In-reply-to Randy Dunlap message dated "Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:39:42 -0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 21.4.1 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:54:22 +1100 Message-ID: <21586.1165470862@neuling.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 16 > > -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > > unsigned long crashk_start = (unsigned long)__va(crashk_res.start); > > unsigned long crashk_end = (unsigned long)__va(crashk_res.end); > > I'm still not seeing how using crashk_res is valid here when > CONFIG_KEXEC=n. Can you explain that, please? > You did test this with KEXEC=y and KEXEC=n, right? Yeah, you'd think I would but apparently not. Sorry, re-sending. Mikey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/