Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp85891pxb; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvthsC7/J0DAsYHWfj+bnTQv/N92IWNxSnmjObvdqfs8HcsIJVRM7S4JpAc6AZUpTzWvvp X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b06:: with SMTP id mp6mr33719771ejc.188.1630449998563; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630449998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SopHnjFOskMwE/S4sh2uzD+8DrXF0r68bUa/E6UOsfCvUwlBkUpbKjGdMufiM/Xekl XTnsbpigt4qLEcZZ5HrvOB5uJNMha0kVTgkbsx/yLKbmhhW5n4GadQTN2enrHDhfd5HX jOTJFCY++mc8GCqckYYoUnquJJT0CPrYEWicLPB276SRnCOTlXZ+IBrKHsXAJ8tVWA3h ZzadlhsNAhvuYXUUuiWFQv9edazEtNWSG1YAa/RMJMqUzOcC4LEhlXNeTcaJoQJF/kGa pjt4FHtQkGokQ5fdcV/gZigqdwzXUUttba0KXfNjnOD5ShEusdrB+JAZjGTEhsITr/5c mejA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=g0s57yEPWIRYy3pbGuid3H+I/WMFFbO84Xddobf8YM8=; b=EWKfVUAhZ7KIPNDGkKNafLC/ZXBHr5mTKs+GFsmK4fNVbZp6QrlIAMx4Z1/zvSMMHR LJgGI6nl7gIlDRhzp87VzKF9RJLwVdxapIF8ME2bq6GvGATap8p+x/IS2aVx4Jgbhk/T NFdAYfj+QlBRfJ3h/YWpUv1QWwJ74zcW6gLiOoFWtsiBokameannOG48b3jflDC7KFJs Qsy9iJD3dDcIZnrZ0Plp3eVTduZV0uWYI5oNwKS10suyhcyqh5rduG1ngUf0gFNleRm4 xdd5c6LnGTBiMJyvy1/nOzylQkuz60FleNJnKwz290+lSBZRCGlRYU9QTSuUSh/DlRbQ R4mA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kd8b2Wcr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp15si19825782ejc.221.2021.08.31.15.46.01; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kd8b2Wcr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238337AbhHaVhz (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:37:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232580AbhHaVhy (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:37:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E4CC061575; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id x11so2156105ejv.0; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g0s57yEPWIRYy3pbGuid3H+I/WMFFbO84Xddobf8YM8=; b=kd8b2WcrBzk7/Yrg1Tvoo3KTg85013xt+LM/RuDGQg+iDbHtzh+ed8uUSmnpmuqRHH VM2/biUhEt7Tosjnxx1de7ByaxM6DKmP/bvxF87nt64OWAVz+Yvt3Vr5KTkrq+omU/bl kVcsxOoo3LS0AdpRxFNr3acSgwlIFJfuWKecYaD+L4TmN9QKUV4cDUVa9kZLkEWAe91h y1BHrrl/tiQy8hjLjVRUMxCdg0lBpMZh4CrnGUYYnXppYVHfDjhLKq0X9rIhjgH6XtoC lhDaLApT+eXhzXgf50oObk2CHqXXoa4e0Z14mjjwRdx0iJfM70mp2xX59iYO/gmFS9UV mkfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g0s57yEPWIRYy3pbGuid3H+I/WMFFbO84Xddobf8YM8=; b=BVxY3fh85bTcf9Kn/RTAK+KExY5EMk7T07cNKdk3ugqLn3IqEfvQmL1B07mJgsH0qZ HjKPqfn9JgrOq/RTmcGMTZtYYYGpFR4k1nXYVbrU3uUAjYU/SCytyhfHvDOSdTrql0MB iMBFRGyRAevALRR9/qeI/VNgrDo+niXZ4K4Omww3AhfhjRUM1yGjfT7/U1mVLLpxf3eR jrj5LWQse9P7LX9IppqzIPrBJa/HMPCZdiiHavX7IyGQXInJHSnHROwfBVLLl9n4i7xE qXF0Nm9v2zwt35LaZvj4j+Gp6EafsITY/FfVJTHHxja7NHowaYcVLx5gXZnxABzii6XT SKZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kRqD3tf91VjBN7bj/uvyVcAcr1RYEOs2IdfDl1+x1OTjyTGPb zIdMPDghG2aP6Vd9picxna37pbRFjfIPn1h/KDE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1289:: with SMTP id k9mr32633983ejb.2.1630445817011; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:36:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210825102636.52757-4-21cnbao@gmail.com> <20210829145552.GA11556@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <1132a536516f15ab6b338ab868ec3705@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1132a536516f15ab6b338ab868ec3705@kernel.org> From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:36:45 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PCI/MSI] a4fc4cf388: dmesg.genirq:Flags_mismatch_irq##(mei_me)vs.#(xhci_hcd) To: Marc Zyngier Cc: kernel test robot , 0day robot , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , Barry Song , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bilbao@vt.edu, Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , leon@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linuxarm , luzmaximilian@gmail.com, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:08 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2021-08-31 02:21, Barry Song wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Greeting, > >> > >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > >> > >> commit: a4fc4cf388319ea957ffbdab5073bdd267de9082 ("[PATCH v3 3/3] > >> PCI/MSI: remove msi_attrib.default_irq in msi_desc") > >> url: > >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Barry-Song/PCI-MSI-Clarify-the-IRQ-sysfs-ABI-for-PCI-devices/20210825-183018 > >> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > >> 6e764bcd1cf72a2846c0e53d3975a09b242c04c9 > >> > >> in testcase: kernel-selftests > >> version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-ebaa603b-1_20210825 > >> with following parameters: > >> > >> group: pidfd > >> ucode: 0xe2 > >> > >> test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the > >> tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small > >> unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel. > >> test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt > >> > >> > >> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz > >> with 32G memory > >> > >> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire > >> log/backtrace): > >> > >> > >> > >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > >> Reported-by: kernel test robot > >> > >> > >> > >> [ 179.602028][ T34] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 16. 00002000 > >> (mei_me) vs. 00000000 (xhci_hcd) > >> [ 179.614073][ T34] CPU: 2 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted > >> 5.14.0-rc7-00014-ga4fc4cf38831 #1 > >> [ 179.623225][ T34] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7040/0Y7WYT, > >> BIOS 1.8.1 12/05/2017 > >> [ 179.631432][ T34] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn > >> [ 179.637543][ T34] Call Trace: > >> [ 179.640789][ T34] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 > >> [ 179.645253][ T34] __setup_irq.cold+0x50/0xd4 > >> [ 179.649893][ T34] ? mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x480/0x480 [mei_me] > >> [ 179.655923][ T34] request_threaded_irq+0x10c/0x180 > >> [ 179.661073][ T34] ? mei_me_irq_quick_handler+0x240/0x240 > >> [mei_me] > >> [ 179.667528][ T34] mei_me_probe+0x131/0x300 [mei_me] > >> [ 179.672767][ T34] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 > >> [ 179.677313][ T34] pci_device_probe+0x107/0x1c0 > >> [ 179.682118][ T34] really_probe+0xb6/0x380 > >> [ 179.687094][ T34] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180 > >> [ 179.692242][ T34] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0xc0 > >> [ 179.697133][ T34] __driver_attach_async_helper+0x2b/0x80 > >> [ 179.702802][ T34] async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0x140 > >> [ 179.707693][ T34] process_one_work+0x274/0x5c0 > >> [ 179.712503][ T34] worker_thread+0x50/0x3c0 > >> [ 179.716959][ T34] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0 > >> [ 179.721936][ T34] kthread+0x14f/0x180 > >> [ 179.725958][ T34] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 > >> [ 179.730935][ T34] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > >> [ 179.735699][ T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: request_threaded_irq > >> failure. irq = 16 > >> [ 179.743125][ T34] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed. > >> [ 179.749399][ T34] mei_me: probe of 0000:00:16.0 failed with error > >> -16 > >> > >> > > > > it seems there is a direct reference to pdev->irq. > > Hi Oliver, would you try if the below patch can fix the problem: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > > index c3393b383e59..a45a2d4257a6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int mei_me_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > > const struct pci_device_id *ent) > > > > pci_enable_msi(pdev); > > > > - hw->irq = pdev->irq; > > + hw->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0); > > > > /* request and enable interrupt */ > > irqflags = pci_dev_msi_enabled(pdev) ? IRQF_ONESHOT : > > IRQF_SHARED; > > > > Ah! one victim, 3000 to go! :D > yep. > That's exactly the kind of stuff I was mentioning when we > discussed this patch. Exposing the MSI vector as the INTx > IRQ has led to all sorts of broken drivers. I guess drivers should depend on int pci_irq_vector(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr) rather than hardcodely use pdev->irq. pci_irq_vector() supports all cases(intx, msi, msi-x) > > M. > -- > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... Thanks barry