Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031886AbWLGJhK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:37:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031892AbWLGJhK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:37:10 -0500 Received: from smtp105.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.215]:24207 "HELO smtp105.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1031886AbWLGJhI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:37:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=F+qDXei2rjcqioVj3YPB5m5nXqA57pefg1Ftv6CPY1R8h3IisNPQmkx/2BrecCHjP6HtrcOhydesAtufhL0iJqWERIy8c1WfIoqDNsURbQanDoWdxmy7EqYSQLyWmKCvMQcluDxE/+og7g+/6DegZ5ggXpAJN0DHiXZ5kn53D0c= ; X-YMail-OSG: UunFxfIVM1nadQNRu4A3iwY8bcNBu_4scnM4Z75j3AElao51.B8PMHXrgMB6VDGdCbjinw5Q9GjsgkIWQreHgxcXxuk2dKUk0iJXiMLE5nKh.aq4_yujjJgEfYkieudO1a7gvDOzrT2fxEY- Message-ID: <4577E095.1040904@yahoo.com.au> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:36:21 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Larry Finger , Andrew Morton , Benoit Boissinot , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 progression References: <456718F6.8040902@lwfinger.net> <40f323d00611240836q6bcf7374gd47c7a97d1d4f8e3@mail.gmail.com> <20061125112437.3d46eff4.akpm@osdl.org> <4574E86B.10403@lwfinger.net> <1165407170.12561.12.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1165407170.12561.12.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1440 Lines: 36 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:32 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: >>There are at least two patches in 2.6.19-rc5-mm2 that make my system much more responsive for >>interactive jobs. The one that has the majority of the effect is: >> >>radix-tree-rcu-lockless-readside.patch >> >>I have not been able to isolate the second patch, which has the lesser effect. All I can say is that >>it occurred before the above patch in patches/series. This patch was tested against 2.6.19 and fixed >>most of the problem on that version. > > > Curious... > > This patch introduces the direct pointer optimisation for single element > radix trees and makes the radix tree safe to read in a lock-less manner > which is not used -yet-. The only difference that that should have is > that the elements are freed using rcu callback instead of directly. > > /me puzzled how this has a large effect on interactivity. > > Nick? I have already got the direct data optimisation upstream. It might be possible that it is some interaction with the extra rcu callbacks going off... I don't know :\ -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/