Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: About resctrl code rebase
To:     "tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Cc:     "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "'soc@kernel.org'" <soc@kernel.org>,
        "'tony.luck@intel.com'" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "'arnd@arndb.de'" <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "'will@kernel.org'" <will@kernel.org>,
        "'catalin.marinas@arm.com'" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "'olof@lixom.net'" <olof@lixom.net>,
        "misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
References: <TYAPR01MB6330CE3CB67CF8F602D44D098BCD9@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
From:   James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Message-ID: <97164928-e2d7-fd3f-e063-9174b028ed65@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:04:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB6330CE3CB67CF8F602D44D098BCD9@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
>> And where is the rebase code? 
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James