Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp824542pxb; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:40:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2WqpPzLjo/DBm6VRAI3B7AbJx3s+I2nE4GSRxhkU0TDkKyLbnV4OvAzc4uZsP2yVALbmV X-Received: by 2002:a92:d12:: with SMTP id 18mr415077iln.287.1630518019727; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:40:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630518019; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tIHeWfDcLBwQMad0ZQs0wl/22ZGhlTD41n+OxNqIj6vbEQ8TtV/roj2LD4wVhqYP/+ rp910wKEcsqD2MBLlR5NGzCzJ8TsEYGea6Z1MP4a0x/NPy+17I+7ScNbY1hKdUrdcAoU lFZt1wSEAEoIyYr/17qmf4kWFHQ0sAuCqs8Z/gs9kXnaYf3Igfv8v+duz5alR1xCNBNv KrAKmGmFtMiP6MjNpbXce9rhpVWa9SJ83SDJafEDPesoRer/47IPQUKtrdu+SQcqeyup DH8DpcSFLP26BvzeEDDw8MLyavM6L/aXNQJVPm4pJdvhmd2TKlNI7G7dXU13Lqff08zY O0TQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=DWtkvJlMDUuSVpfpufPPMomOgMZOfFN4R7d4sEHZZ8Q=; b=AAGIcDRd+zUUWtmW6syf9p85viFTRZtvZjbMZd3lzAN58kUIgMcEcjfemIgwqHp0cw sP+okqI0k4AOmL/QqSTvaiaR6ss7Lyu06f2u0GmJ+V5qzVxSSmDKYJM1799ITgKRCOsl lVR39XEzDNA/RAEg/nFtlhwd41MTimLblYYUBUTlfV1Ra2MGmh0wAXHnEfOM2DZUpANh viXnopNchpVDez9QflE39jNI2yg/WqrOzn5pMbNMaKZP6BtsN2jGy3XRvnSBOlwW1nel +liW/LOEym6zkEs9FKVF18cXlOwRGSabTfJIDV1EKsLfhUY1VaEShJMNB73ziifQCsHR u33Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bvmboH6Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x8si106005jaq.91.2021.09.01.10.40.04; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bvmboH6Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344734AbhIARjQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:39:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:42459 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236428AbhIARjO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:39:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630517897; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DWtkvJlMDUuSVpfpufPPMomOgMZOfFN4R7d4sEHZZ8Q=; b=bvmboH6Qpn34XbzkNcJqginTZZ708IghLpcDh5dmYM4nRRynShZkLVsNORUfcjH98HqRG4 QvUkCrO4mW+aNtQHOxcvRc7ELYXUNjftVJd1Mz2uKmcGQzK2hcOve2KBZH8eKYu6/cfR1n JNFn6xec963XCtUdbNSIe7kcJE07y6o= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-560-d4wxk0hHOo6tRm1XpjtNJw-1; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:38:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: d4wxk0hHOo6tRm1XpjtNJw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2C4501E3; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fuller.cnet (ovpn-112-3.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.112.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48305DEB8; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fuller.cnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C7A541752A0; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:34:01 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:34:01 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Nitesh Lal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Frederic Weisbecker , Christoph Lameter , Juri Lelli , Peter Zijlstra , Alex Belits , Peter Xu Subject: Re: [patch V3 2/8] add prctl task isolation prctl docs and samples Message-ID: <20210901173401.GB48995@fuller.cnet> References: <20210824152423.300346181@fuller.cnet> <20210824152646.706875395@fuller.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:11:56AM -0400, Nitesh Lal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:42 AM Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Add documentation and userspace sample code for prctl > > task isolation interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti > > > > --- > > Documentation/userspace-api/task_isolation.rst | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > samples/Kconfig | 7 > > samples/Makefile | 1 > > samples/task_isolation/Makefile | 9 + > > samples/task_isolation/task_isol.c | 83 +++++++++ > > samples/task_isolation/task_isol.h | 9 + > > samples/task_isolation/task_isol_userloop.c | 56 ++++++ > > 7 files changed, 376 insertions(+) > > [...] > > > + if (ret) { > > + perror("mlock"); > > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > > + } > > + > > + ret = task_isol_setup(); > > + if (ret) > > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > > The above check condition should be 'ret == -1', isn't it? task_isol_setup returns 0 on success, so fail to see the point of testing for ret == -1 rather than ret != 0 ?